>
You effectively have to keep the types of all the things involved in your head and/or trace them to ensure that you don't run into a crash.You make this sound difficult, but in practice type errors are rare in Clojure and generally caught in the REPL or by tests, since the moment you go down a branch with a type error an exception is thrown.
Contrast this to errors caused via mutable state, which are usually far harder to track down, because the failure condition is more specific.
> This is trivial in TypeScript.
In the example you give you're omitting assoc entirely, which defeats the point. I'm using assoc as a minimal example, but the same principle applies to more complex functions, so replacing assoc with the equivalent expression doesn't tell us whether or not we can effectively type a function that deals with maps.
So lets try doing this properly. At minimum we need something like this:
type Assoc =
Omit & Record;
function assoc(
m: M, k: K, v: V): Assoc {
return { ...m, [k]: v } as Assoc;
}
(Note that we need to perform an explicit cast in order to inform TypeScript of the type of the key.)
However, this produces some rather messy types consisting of nested Assocs. In order to get back to something a human can read, we can use an additional Simplify type to force the type system to reduce it back down into an typed object:
type Simplify = {[K in keyof T]: T[K]} & {};
type Assoc =
Simplify & Record>;
function assoc(
m: M, k: K, v: V): Assoc {
return { ...m, [k]: v } as Assoc;
}
(The empty `& {}` intersection forces normalization, providing a cleaner reported type.)
We're still not done, though, as if we want the same type checking that a class has, we need to ensure that a key cannot be overwritten with a value of a differing type. So we'll type the value argument as well to ensure it matches the type of an existing value within the map:
type Simplify = {[K in keyof T]: T[K]} & {};
type Assoc =
Simplify>;
type AssocValue =
K extends keyof M ? (V extends M[K] ? V : never) : V;
function assoc(
m: M, k: K, v: AssocValue): Assoc {
return { ...m, [k]: v } as Assoc;
}
So this is
possible to type in TypeScript (to its credit), but is it "trivial"? And is this type signature significantly less complex than one might find in Haskell?