Earlier quoted context omitted.
> logic and experience This is patronising drivel. We burn gas when there is no wind & sun. We do this because there no alternative other than the lights going out. You are not seeing the whole.
Let me rephrase your comment: When there is sun and/or wind we burn less gas. Gas current and futures price for just the gas that needs burned (nothing about plant maintenance or carbon price to compensate for pollution or cost for building the plant or paying loans taken to build it etc.) is at 100, 90 and 80 pounds per MWh over the next 3 years. That is more than the cost to build entirely new solar and wind, about…
Our energy is expensive and volatile because of this (and subsidies to implement it). You don't seem to be capable of following my argument. It's not a free lunch. Renewables are also slightly problematic for grid stability although I expect we will have enough fast storage / (possibly synthetic) inertia eventually.
"What if we don't fix the roof?"
"but it's sunny?"