Live data from Hacker News

AI-assisted cognition endangers human development?

heidenstedt.org

201–202 of 202 posts

Re: AI-assisted cognition endangers human development?

#201
post #198
post #182

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Let’s not avoid the problem by being disingenuous. The below, to you, does not qualify as trying to be an intellectual? The author skips over 150 years of engagement with Peirce and tries to go straight back to the source but fails to locate any actual reason to do so: > In the research phase of this article, I came to the conclusion that existing system models are insufficient as they do not describe the process of…

Hi, so i am not entirely sure what you mean with "trying to be an intellectual", to me it sounds like a personal attack tbh and a quite cynic one. I wanted to preventively write about all the concepts i have looked at because i wanted to prevent that people get hung up on the form and stop discussing about the content the the core message of my post. As i wrote i don't see that "150 years of Peirce" have produced a m…

[deleted]

Re: AI-assisted cognition endangers human development?

#202
post #198
post #182

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Let’s not avoid the problem by being disingenuous. The below, to you, does not qualify as trying to be an intellectual? The author skips over 150 years of engagement with Peirce and tries to go straight back to the source but fails to locate any actual reason to do so: > In the research phase of this article, I came to the conclusion that existing system models are insufficient as they do not describe the process of…

Hi, so i am not entirely sure what you mean with "trying to be an intellectual", to me it sounds like a personal attack tbh and a quite cynic one. I wanted to preventively write about all the concepts i have looked at because i wanted to prevent that people get hung up on the form and stop discussing about the content the the core message of my post. As i wrote i don't see that "150 years of Peirce" have produced a m…

As others have intimated: the post's theorizing seems pretentious and distracts from a maybe unoriginal message.

It's a problem of form and substance. The words feel like academic cosplay, dressing up loose thinking to inflate weak insights.

Post reply on HN