Live data from Hacker News

Artemis II crew take “spectacular” image of Earth

bbc.com

201–210 of 419 posts

Re: Artemis II crew take “spectacular” image of Earth

#203
post #143

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They're in space so they only sort of need to hold the camera.

Or maybe press the timer and let it float...

or sticky-tape it to the window.

d5 has an actual shutter yeah? not mirrorless? I think the shutter moving will spin the camera.

Re: Artemis II crew take “spectacular” image of Earth

#204

Looking at the EXIF (with exiftool) for the image uploaded by NASA ( https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/art002e00019... ), apparently this was taken by a Nikon D5 with an AF-S Zoom-Nikkor 14-24mm f/2.8G ED and developed with Lightroom. It also seems like very little was done in Lightroom. Amazing... I dumped the whole EXIF here: https://gist.github.com/umgefahren/a6f555e6588a98adb74eed79d...

The EXIF data says that the picture was taken with the flash off!

How did they get the Earth to light up when it is obviously dark outside? Is this fake?

Re: Artemis II crew take “spectacular” image of Earth

#206
post #202

How are people still flat-earthers after stuff like this

Maybe I'm just a dumb optimist, but I've always assumed that the flat earthers started out as an enteraining debate club intentionally trying to prove something impossible just for the challenge, which got overtaken by a tiny number of vocal idiots. I have heard they largely have moved on to Qanon, which tracks.

Re: Artemis II crew take “spectacular” image of Earth

#208
Why didn't NASA or the news agencies rotate the image so North is up? and slightly to the right. That would make Africa instantly recognizable as that's how maps are imprinted in our brains.

There is no "up" in space, so that wouldn't be editing the image I feel. The camera just happened to be oriented "upside down".

Re: Artemis II crew take “spectacular” image of Earth

#210

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The Lightroom one was processed from raw. Also, by brightening it a lot, the noisy high-ISO grain becomes more apparent. Noise is famously incompressible, so it leads to a much larger file size.

Brightening the image may make the iso noise easier to see, but it doesn't create it.

It's not lossless
Post reply on HN