Artemis II crew take “spectacular” image of Earth
201–210 of 419 posts
Re: Artemis II crew take “spectacular” image of Earth
#202Re: Artemis II crew take “spectacular” image of Earth
#203Re: Artemis II crew take “spectacular” image of Earth
#204Looking at the EXIF (with exiftool) for the image uploaded by NASA ( https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/art002e00019... ), apparently this was taken by a Nikon D5 with an AF-S Zoom-Nikkor 14-24mm f/2.8G ED and developed with Lightroom. It also seems like very little was done in Lightroom. Amazing... I dumped the whole EXIF here: https://gist.github.com/umgefahren/a6f555e6588a98adb74eed79d...
How did they get the Earth to light up when it is obviously dark outside? Is this fake?
Re: Artemis II crew take “spectacular” image of Earth
#205How are people still flat-earthers after stuff like this
What does scale, unfortunately, is arrant nonsense.
Re: Artemis II crew take “spectacular” image of Earth
#206How are people still flat-earthers after stuff like this
Re: Artemis II crew take “spectacular” image of Earth
#207How are people still flat-earthers after stuff like this
Re: Artemis II crew take “spectacular” image of Earth
#208There is no "up" in space, so that wouldn't be editing the image I feel. The camera just happened to be oriented "upside down".
Re: Artemis II crew take “spectacular” image of Earth
#209Re: Artemis II crew take “spectacular” image of Earth
#210Earlier quoted context omitted.
The Lightroom one was processed from raw. Also, by brightening it a lot, the noisy high-ISO grain becomes more apparent. Noise is famously incompressible, so it leads to a much larger file size.
Brightening the image may make the iso noise easier to see, but it doesn't create it.