Live data from Hacker News

Parallels confirms MacBook Neo can run Windows in a virtual machine

macrumors.com

201–210 of 473 posts

Re: Parallels confirms MacBook Neo can run Windows in a virtual machine

#202

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And run what on the Chromebook exactly?

Web browser and youtube. You know, what people mostly do on macbooks.

Aside from gaming, I can do basically everything on Mac that I can on Linux or Windows. That's a hell of a lot more than a Chromebook. Take it from someone who has owned both a Chromebook and a Macbook; suggesting that they are in the same league is silly.

Also, used != new. I'm surprised people need to be reminded of this.

Re: Parallels confirms MacBook Neo can run Windows in a virtual machine

#203

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But that’s all you can do on Chromebooks.

Are you sure about that?

You can do more if you have a lot more RAM. Otherwise you really are that restricted.

In the country I live in, there is no comparable Chromebook spec-wise on par with the Neo at a similar price point. You're basically stuck with 4GB RAM.

Re: Parallels confirms MacBook Neo can run Windows in a virtual machine

#204

Earlier quoted context omitted.

VMWare Fusion is free, even if it is a pain in the butt to download. It also has GPU paravirtualization for Linux/Windows which is the only reason I use a proprietary VMM on macOS these days.

You can also use UTM to run Windows for free and it is open source. https://mac.getutm.app

Because I was fed up with parallels subscription model and they make me pay for the upgrade the non-subscription version with every new macOS release, I dropped parallels for UTM. I barely need windows, only every other month or so and often just for some small tasks. UTM is nice, but performance running windows is waaay below parallels. It is free, however, so I won't complain.

Re: Parallels confirms MacBook Neo can run Windows in a virtual machine

#205

MacBook Neo is going to sell like crazy. In the education market, educators, students, aides... nothing close at this price point. With memory and SSD prices so high I don't see how Dell, Asus and others are going to be able to compete. Unless the build quality is significantly worse than a M1 macbook air not sure budget PC makers will be able to compete.

Apple is going to cannibalize their own laptop market.

M1 macbook air has been available at Walmart priced at $600-650 for years (8gb, 256 ssd). Why did that not cannibalize Apple's laptop market?

Re: Parallels confirms MacBook Neo can run Windows in a virtual machine

#207

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> and can be repaired The Macbook Neo is highly repairable too [1]. Not _quite_ as repairable as some Thinkpads with a 10/10 score, but still pretty respectable at a 6/10 with easily replaceable batteries and stuff. [1] https://www.ifixit.com/News/116152/macbook-neo-is-the-most-r...

8 GB RAM and 6/10 "respectable" repairability.

Have you owned an M-series MacBook?

Re: Parallels confirms MacBook Neo can run Windows in a virtual machine

#208
post #152

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In the US, cheap ThinkPads like E14 sometimes sell for a bit less when you factor in all typical discounts. They are good machines that run Linux well and can be repaired. In EU, and I imagine other markets, there's nothing remotely close. I hope this puts some pressure on Lenovo and the rest of manufacturers to be more competitive.

In the EU it costs $200 more so it's more like a low to mid range laptop. I have a feeling these are aimed at the same sector as the Framework 12, school provided laptops for kids meant to be bought in bulk by institutions. But there they're competing against $150 Chromebooks and neither is even close.

In the EU, you don't need to buy an extended warranty, since existing consumer protection laws require the sort of extended repair coverage Americans have to pay extra for.

Taxes are also included in the EU price, but not the US price.

Re: Parallels confirms MacBook Neo can run Windows in a virtual machine

#210
post #87

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Windows doesn't run "just fine" on 4 GiB of RAM. I had a laptop with 6; Windows 10 became barely usable. If you want to run one, small, program at a time I think you'll be ok. Forget about web browsing; you'll get one tab and it'll be slow.

Agreed. Windows 10/11 can run just fine on 4GB of RAM. You just can't run anything inside of Windows 10/11 with 4GB of RAM. The last version of Windows that felt like 4GB of RAM was performant for me with applications was Windows XP. Not that every computer running the 32-bit edition of Windows XP could even see/utilize a full 4GB of RAM properly, but at least it was fast.

My Windows 7 laptop had 4GB RAM and I played Crysis 2 on it. 4GB was absolutely enough for a performant system.
Post reply on HN