201–210 of 273 posts
All those "merged" workflows only work, if you actually merge the branches. It doesn't work with a squash merge workflow.
edit: I delegate this task to a coding agent. I'm really bad at bash commands. yolo!
Unfortunately its name makes it hard to search for and find.
The only case in which this wouldn't work is when you have a ton of necessary local branches you can't even push to remote, which is a risk and anti-pattern per se.
git branch -vv | grep ': gone\]' | awk '{print $1}' | xargs -n 1 git branch -D
What's wrong with just deleting the whole folder and clone repo and whatever branch you're interested in? In any case it's not an urgent thing. You don't have to do this mid-work, you can wait until you push most stuff and then rm && git clone. The only case in which this wouldn't work is when you have a ton of necessary local branches you can't even push to remote, which is a risk and anti-pattern per se.
I use `master` in all my repos because I've been using it since forever and it never has once occurred to me "oh shit I better change it to `main` this time in case `master` may offend somebody some day. Unfortunately, that's the last thing on my mind when I'm in programming mode. Now that everything is `master`, maybe it is just a simple git command to change it to `main`. But, my fear is it'll subtly break somethin…
[flagged]
What's wrong with just deleting the whole folder and clone repo and whatever branch you're interested in? In any case it's not an urgent thing. You don't have to do this mid-work, you can wait until you push most stuff and then rm && git clone. The only case in which this wouldn't work is when you have a ton of necessary local branches you can't even push to remote, which is a risk and anti-pattern per se.
because of my precious stash? but also the repo is huge, the clone takes 10 minutes? And all the other branches...
you mean the… pile of shame?
So effectively "I just discovered xargs"? Not to disparage OP but there isn't anything particularly novel here.
I currently have a TUI addiction. Each time I want something to be easier, I open claude-code and ask for a TUI. Now I have a git worktree manager where I can add/rebase/delete. As TUI library I use Textual which claude handles quite well, especially as it can test-run quite some Python code.
how do you trust the code claude wrote? don't you get anxiety "what if there's an error in tui code and it would mess up my git repo"?