Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Good riddance to software subscriptions. Counter argument ... at what point is software still profitable to be sold? I am running my Office 2007 still, and that thing is now almost 20 years old. That was a one time sale, with no other revenue for Microsoft. I am not condoning subscriptions but one time selling software only works good, if your a small team with low overhead. The more you sell, the more support beco…
I buy the support argument for companies. I also buy the argument that a lot of time people are actually paying for cloud storage. While I'd love to see a generic protocol for cloud or self-hosted storage that every app can sync to, I expect we'll continue to see subscription software persist by locking down and gatekeeping cloud storage and sync, too. But really I would be happy for that to go away. I don't use much…
This works for some software (developer tools is the prime example) but not so much for other things. Who is going to maintain the MTD software I used for my VAT returns without recompense. Who is going to update the PAYE payroll software I relied on.
Even with developer tools I feel we will lose something without companies like JetBrains. There would be no Kotlin without people paying for their software.
That's before you think about huge corporations leeching off of our free work or the AI companies vacuuming up open source only to regurgitate it for $200 a month.
Developers should consider that most people value things by how much they pay and if they aren't paying anything then you and your work can't have much value.