Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is there any issue for adult males vaccinating ? I seem to remember some mention of risk by my doctor when I asked about it, but I might be misremembering.
There is currently no vaccine that is zero risk
HPV vaccination reduces oncogenic HPV16/18 prevalence from 16% to <1% in Denmark
201–210 of 383 posts
Re: HPV vaccination reduces oncogenic HPV16/18 prevalence from 16% to <1% in Denmark
#202Earlier quoted context omitted.
The reason it's not recommended for all ages is money. Not safety concerns. Same reason you can't get Shingrix under a certain age.
I think the main reason it isn't recommended for all ages is that it wears off. If you get it before 50, when your immune system starts declining, you might end up getting shingles when you're 60 or 70. Insurance companies used to only pay for the vaccine at 60. They've reduced it to 50 now because people (like me) were getting it in their 50's. I got it in my left eye and because my immune system is kinda shit, I st…
Re: HPV vaccination reduces oncogenic HPV16/18 prevalence from 16% to <1% in Denmark
#203Earlier quoted context omitted.
You get to make your own health choices here, but as someone who got the vaccine in my 30s, I am glad as I didn’t know about my future divorce when I got vaccinated.
Couldn’t you have gotten the vaccine after your divorce if you wanted?
Re: HPV vaccination reduces oncogenic HPV16/18 prevalence from 16% to <1% in Denmark
#204Earlier quoted context omitted.
I said wh ere this trust has broken down _or is breaking down_ - the latter is what is happening in the mentioned countries. First answer and you directly go to 'racism', that's a rather poor effort. Put some more thought into your replies if you want to be taken seriously.
I know you said or is breaking down . I'm telling you that its only for Netherlands you can argue a drop in trust. I'm sorry that you take the racist label as an insult. But the Sweden has fallen talking point is a racist lie, so don't perpetuate it if you don't want to be called out on it. Again I invite you to look at data on trust, and stop making stuff up.
Re: HPV vaccination reduces oncogenic HPV16/18 prevalence from 16% to <1% in Denmark
#205Earlier quoted context omitted.
I would happily pay for Shingrix.
Prepare your happy for a very profit-laden high three-figure bill.
https://www.boots.com/online/pharmacy-services/shingles-vacc...
> Price per dose:£230
> Full course (2 doses):£460
Re: HPV vaccination reduces oncogenic HPV16/18 prevalence from 16% to <1% in Denmark
#206I would like to add: - HPVs are extremely common: 80% of men and 90% of women will have at least one strain in their lives. Unless you plan to remain completely celibate, you are likely to contract a strain. - Sooner is better, but vaccination can be done at any age. Guidelines often lag behind, but vaccination makes sense even if you are currently HPV-positive. While it won't clear an existing infection, it protects…
For those men wondering whether they should get vaccinated: - HPV causes genital warts, HPV is permanent, doctors won't test you for HPV unless you demand it, and the tests aren't reliable, which is why they literally won't diagnose you unless you already have genital warts. - Once you are confirmed HPV positive (again, you won't be confirmed without getting genital warts), you need to inform your partners, as it cau…
1) not every strain of HPV causes cancer (iirc, the bad ones are rare).
2) many people (in fact, most people) who are active in the world have been infected with at least one strain of HPV.
3) it’s common to have asymptomatic HPV infections. you probably have one now.
one more:
4) the vaccines likely have little effect on anything unless you were vaccinated as a child (and are a biological woman).
Overall, it’s a situation where you’re asking that sexual partners “disclose” something that the partner probably already has, if they bothered to be tested for it to begin with. Moreover, nobody does these tests (in men, at least), because there’s no point to doing them, other than creating anxiety.
I will leave the nuances of bioethics to other people, but it’s not as clear a situation as you’re making it out to be.
One final thing: these infections aren’t “permanent”. They generally clear naturally in a few years.
Re: HPV vaccination reduces oncogenic HPV16/18 prevalence from 16% to <1% in Denmark
#207Lots of viruses are really oncogenic. The real success here is the ability of Denmark to track effectiveness. It sounds crazy but most countries do not have electronic health record capability to measure the effect of many interventions at population scale. Once good EHRs are rolled out, we will be able to double down on effective interventions, like this one, and vice versa.
Sadly, no matter how good the data is, some societies will value opinions of uninformed celebrities above facts and reason, leading to a resurgence of preventable diseases.
Re: HPV vaccination reduces oncogenic HPV16/18 prevalence from 16% to <1% in Denmark
#208Earlier quoted context omitted.
That is terribly difficult. Why the hell do I have to make an appointment weeks in advance, then take time out of my day just to get permission from some asshole who asks about my sexual history? Why can't I just walk up to the counter, say "I'll take one HPV vaccine please" and pay the money? If you want me to get vaccinated make it easy.
Because we over-rely on insurance for routine medical care, when really insurance should just be reserved for the catastrophic and everything else out of pocket (and/or directly subsidized).
Re: HPV vaccination reduces oncogenic HPV16/18 prevalence from 16% to <1% in Denmark
#209Re: HPV vaccination reduces oncogenic HPV16/18 prevalence from 16% to <1% in Denmark
#210Earlier quoted context omitted.
You get to make your own health choices here, but as someone who got the vaccine in my 30s, I am glad as I didn’t know about my future divorce when I got vaccinated.
Couldn’t you have gotten the vaccine after your divorce if you wanted?