“ Photo of a blond male in his 50s with half gray hair “
Still fails. Every photo of a man with half gray hair will have the other half black.
GPT Image 1.5
201–210 of 272 posts
Re: GPT Image 1.5
#202Lots of em-dashes in this copy.
Re: GPT Image 1.5
#203Why is the emphasis of these promos always to create fake social media pictures of people and things that didnt happen?
Aren't we plagued enough by all the fake bullshit out there.
Ffs!
/rant
Sorry gotta be honest and blunt every one of those times...
Re: GPT Image 1.5
#204Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Somehow it feels like we’re moving backwards. I don't understand why everyone isn't in awe of this. This is legitimately magical technology. We've had 60+ years of being able to express our ideas with keyboards. Steve Jobs' "bicycle of the mind". But in all this time we've had a really tough time of visually expressing ourselves. Only highly trained people can use Blender, Photoshop, Illustrator, etc. whereas almos…
I'm struggling to see the benefits. All I see people using this for is generating slop for work presentations, and misleading people on social media. Misleading might be understating it too. It's being used to create straight up propaganda and destruction of the sense of reality.
[deleted]
Re: GPT Image 1.5
#205Having used it compared to Nano Banana:
-The latency is still too high, lower than 10 seconds for nano banana and around 25 seconds for GPT image 1.5
-The quality is higher but not a jump like previous google models to Nano Banana Pro. Nano banana pro is still at least equivalently good or better in my opinion.
Re: GPT Image 1.5
#206Earlier quoted context omitted.
You're just not describing what you want properly. Looks fine to me. Clearly you have something else in mind, so I think you're just not describing well. My tip would be to use actuall illustration language. Do you want a wide angle shot? What should depth of field be? Oil painting print? Ink illustration? What kind of printing style? Do you want a photo of the book or a pre-print proof? What kind of color scheme? A…
The killer feature of LLMs is to be able to extrapolate what's really wanted from short descriptions. Look again at Gemini's output, it looks like an actual book cover, it looks like an illustration that could be found on a book. It takes on board corrections (albeit hilariously literaly). Look at GPT image's output, it doesn't look anything like a book cover, and when prompted to say it got it wrong, just doubles do…
What you want, and what you think image generation is, is impossible.
Re: GPT Image 1.5
#207Can't wait to generate fake memories with my 20 years ago dead grandma
Re: GPT Image 1.5
#208Is there a watermarking, or some other way for normal people to tell if its fake?
Not if you strip the EXIF data. Also, it will strip the star watermark and SynthID from Gemini if you paste a Nano Banana pic in and tell it to mirror it.
Re: GPT Image 1.5
#209Still can't pass my image test Two women walking in single file Although it tried very hard and had them staggered slightly
Interestingly when you Google that literally all of the images have two women walking side by side
Re: GPT Image 1.5
#210If this was a farm of sweatshop Photoshopers in 2010, who download all images from the internet and provide a service of combining them on your request, this would escalate pretty quickly. Question: with copyright and authorship dead wrt AI, how do I make (at least) new content protected? Anecdotal: I had a hobby of doing photos in quite rare style and lived in a place where you'd get quite a few pictures of. When I…
I guess some kind of hard (repetitive) steganography where the private key signature of the original photo is somehow encoded lots of times; also watermarking everything and asking the reader for some kind of verification if they want their non-watermarked copy.
There seems to be no other way (apart from air-gapping everything, as others say).