Live data from Hacker News

Migrating Dillo from GitHub

dillo-browser.org

201–210 of 219 posts

Re: Migrating Dillo from GitHub

#201
> it is a single point of failure. I don't mean that GitHub is stored in a single machine, but it is controlled by a single entity which can unilateraly ban our repository or account

Besides the usability problems with bloated MS Shitware, this is a strategic point that I see considered far too rarely for my taste.

Re: Migrating Dillo from GitHub

#202

Although I'm not a fan of GH, I appreciate the ability to see how popular/valid some project is by looking at the number of stars (I know this is far from a perfect signal). I'm much less likely to try projects that have a low number of stars, or projects in different places.

God forbid we'd have to actually look at the code itself to figure out whether something is good.

GP explicitly stated that they use stars to determine the popularity of a repository, not the code quality.

Re: Migrating Dillo from GitHub

#203

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is kind of like asking what the point of Dropbox is when we have rsync. Rsync is nice, but most people won't know how to use it.

Setting up a server with SSH and GitLab is more work than setting up a server with SSH. Dropbox is great and I use it but only because I can’t get the same functionality out of rsync without major additional orchestration. But if I am the only one working on my own project why would I need a second read-only UI for my own code?

If you're working alone you can also send raw IP packets down the wire by way of telegraph key if you'd like. What you do alone behind closed doors isn't really anyone's business and is up to you. For everyone else, the benefit of using Gitlab is that once it's set up, a wide range of users of varying skill levels and backgrounds can use it to collaborate.

Re: Migrating Dillo from GitHub

#204
Isn't there one 'd' missing ...

As for gitlab versus github: I understand that gitlab may have more features and thus options, but I can't stand its default UI. Every time I use it I am annoyed compared to the github variant. Perhaps gitlab is nicer to have for teams, but from a user's perspective, I feel gitlab is worse than github (UI-wise primarily).

Re: Migrating Dillo from GitHub

#208

Earlier quoted context omitted.

On their home page they have links to some repositories (or equivalent term) on a couple of Darcs hosts. https://hub.darcs.net https://smeder.ee Here's a recent discussion about Darcs, it's the first I've heard of it. Darcs, Friendly Version Control - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43022059 (9 months ago | 76 comments)

Darcs is older than Git

Most version control systems are. At some point Linus said "let me show you how it's done", made git, and there haven't been many attempts since.

Re: Migrating Dillo from GitHub

#209
post #19

I've been messing around with GitLab as a self hosted alternative for a few years. I do like it, but it is resource intensive! For the past few days I've been playing with Forgejo (from the Codeberg people). It is fantastic. The biggest difference is memory usage. GitLab is Ruby on Rails and over a dozen services (gitlab itself, then nginx, postgrest, prometheus, etc). Forgejo is written in go and is a single binary.…

I wish I could search in Gitlab like I could in Jira's SQL-esque query syntax, but otherwise its interface is a step-up, if still pretty "busy" for my taste.

Re: Migrating Dillo from GitHub

#210
post #179
post #176

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Darcs? Fossil? Subversion?

i still kind of miss mercurial.

You don't need to, Jujutsu[1] gives you most of mercurial with some additional stuff. And relevant for this subthread, Tangled appears to work with it[2].

[1] https://docs.jj-vcs.dev/latest/

[2] https://blog.tangled.org/stacking

Post reply on HN