Earlier quoted context omitted.
People holding your current naive viewpoint is why we have professional societies with the power to remove licenses/disbar. Someone who takes the hippocratic oath and then behaves in this manner is not fit to be a caregiver. Medical care is about more than technical competence. I’d hate to see the state of the flattened world you seem to be arguing for. Please go read about the origins of professional standards.
> People holding your current naive viewpoint is why we have professional societies with the power to remove licenses/disbar. > Someone who takes the hippocratic oath and then behaves in this manner is not fit to be a caregiver. Medical care is about more than technical competence. > I’d hate to see the state of the flattened world you seem to be arguing for. Please go read about the origins of professional standards…
> Jamal now takes full responsibility and “regrets having exposed patients to the risk of harm by enrolling them in studies which had no value.”
There is no pathos in my comment. Your statement is literally naive.