Earlier quoted context omitted.
Eh, it's not entirely that simple. In the same way teachers are, some people are just compelled towards it because it's what feels "right" to them. And, just, don't forget that a lot of the people who are "sticking around" went to j-school and now have a significant amount of debt. So leaving journalism isn't exactly the cleanest option for them. Donate to your local investigative nonprofit.
If honest journalists are “sticking around” that would mean loaning those shady editors with ulterior motives some of their credibility, thus helping to prop the latter up. So it seems like a net negative.
You did no fact checking, and I must scream
201–204 of 204 posts
Re: You did no fact checking, and I must scream
#202Earlier quoted context omitted.
If honest journalists are “sticking around” that would mean loaning those shady editors with ulterior motives some of their credibility, thus helping to prop the latter up. So it seems like a net negative.
I have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.
There literally doesn’t seem to be any substance I can respond to.
Re: You did no fact checking, and I must scream
#203Earlier quoted context omitted.
I have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.
So then ask a question? Or don’t reply? There literally doesn’t seem to be any substance I can respond to.
Re: You did no fact checking, and I must scream
#204I've done a fair amount of data-intensive fact checking for journalism articles and have had fact checking done on my own data-intensive reporting. Couple things: 1. Fact checkers are not paid enough to do what they do. They're usually freelancers and they're usually financially struggling. The dynamics of that are difficult to say the least. 2. Editors change things last minute without informing the journalist whose…