From MIT's financials ( https://facts.mit.edu/operating-financials/ ): Operating Revenue: $5.07B, out of which - Federal funding (sponsored support): $2.30B Operating Costs: $4.78B, out of which - Sponsored research expenditure: $2.10B Additionally, they seem to have $24.57B worth of endowed funds and get gifts and pledges of net ~$0.6B every year. Looks like they can wane off their dependence on federal funding if o…
I really find it surprising how often people bring up endowments as if they are a resource that can be spent. The purpose of an endowment is to produce revenue via investment income; that investment income is already reflected in the operating revenue under "Investment return to operations". MIT cannot and should not spend their endowment beyond this investment income; doing so would jeopardize the long-term viabilit…
Regarding the Compact
201–203 of 203 posts
Re: Regarding the Compact
#202Earlier quoted context omitted.
Most of the document seems reasonable though.
Does it? The entire Compact document is contradictory. "We don't want diversity initiatives unless they benefit the white American and conservative thought." "We want only the best and brightest to be let in, unless they are foreign or female." MIT is clearly rejecting it diplomatically
Re: Regarding the Compact
#203Earlier quoted context omitted.
Does it? The entire Compact document is contradictory. "We don't want diversity initiatives unless they benefit the white American and conservative thought." "We want only the best and brightest to be let in, unless they are foreign or female." MIT is clearly rejecting it diplomatically
I looked for your quote "We don't want diversity initiatives unless they benefit the white American and conservative thought." but couldn't find it anywhere.