Earlier quoted context omitted.
> A good manager gets in a fight with their superior(s) if their superior happens to be wrong. A bad manager will avoid conflict with their superior, nod too unrealistic demands and then badmouth the superior with their team. A catastrophic manager will actively push unrealistic plans towards their superior. You've put forward a false dichotomy between punching my manager in the face and nodding along silently to eve…
> You've put forward a false dichotomy between punching my manager in the face and nodding along silently to everything I'm told. Frankly, both will get me fired pretty quickly. No I did not. I characterized a certain type of person by how they would act at the extremes. Naturally most day to day decisions are not taking part at those extremes. Also these being a false dichotomy would mean you can somehow both nod al…
> I characterized a certain type of person by how they would act at the extremes.
This is literally a false dichotomy.
> Why did you turn what I said into "punch them in the face"?
It's called dramatic effect, I don't literally think that you said it but my comment stands even if you take your literal argument.
> But what if the manager had not said the truth but (trying to please the superior) promised impossible things?
Neither I nor the article argue you should do this, so you threw a strawman on top of your false dichotomy. I don't see how we can have a fruitful discussion when the positions you claim are being taken are positions that exist only in your head.