Live data from Hacker News

Airpass – Easily overcome WiFi time limits

airpass.tiagoalves.me

201–210 of 278 posts

Re: Airpass – Easily overcome WiFi time limits

#201
post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It just resets the MAC address, making the router believe it's a new device, thus not subject to the "x minute" free WiFi.

That won't circumvent the sms code requirement most free wifi services use.

Or the voucher obtained by scanning your boarding pass in some airports.

Re: Airpass – Easily overcome WiFi time limits

#203
post #89

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've been pretty aware of this ever since I became a cyclist. I will ride down to the corner store to pick up a six pack and some chips, throw them in a backpack and ride back. It's easy. I see people driving their cars to do the same thing. All that weight and space for a 6 bottles of beer. There is massive waste all around us.

Those people could be driving from 20 minutes away or on their way home from work, or running other errands or picking kids up from school or any number of things. Good for you though.

Fortunately trains and buses exist.

Re: Airpass – Easily overcome WiFi time limits

#204
post #89
post #69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

On a related note: Transporting a human in a car is (in relation to weight and size) like using a standard shopping cart to transport two 1L bottles of water. So the next time you walk through a pedestrian area, imagine everyone carrying a bag would use a shopping cart instead. That would be a huge traffic jam -- exactly like what you see on the road!

I've been pretty aware of this ever since I became a cyclist. I will ride down to the corner store to pick up a six pack and some chips, throw them in a backpack and ride back. It's easy. I see people driving their cars to do the same thing. All that weight and space for a 6 bottles of beer. There is massive waste all around us.

Getting a trailer (burley cargo in this case, but applies more generally) has been a game changer. I can even bike to ikea and bring back flat packed furniture with it. Or do the weekly groceries. The trailer can carry up to 100lbs iirc (I have an e-bike)

Short errands are much nicer with a bike: less effort than walking, much faster than walking, no parking headache at destination, cool breeze in your hair, and free (no gas, insurance, parking, tickets…)

Re: Airpass – Easily overcome WiFi time limits

#205
post #46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Modern app bloat in one analogy: Business logic size: ~20 bytes Total app size: ~47 MB = 47,000,000 bytes Bloat factor: 47,000,000 / 20 = 2,350,000 Let’s scale this up and say the business logic is 1 pound. Then the whole app would weigh: 1 lb × 2,350,000 = 2,350,000 pounds What weighs ~2.35 million pounds? - A fully loaded Boeing 747-8: ~987,000 lbs - Another fully loaded 747-8: ~987,000 lbs - A blue whale: ~330,000…

This is an absurd way to think of this. Following this same train of thoughts for humans: The business logic for humans is a single reproductive cell. A single sperm weighs 2.3 x 10^-11 grams. If the average male weighs 75kg the. The bloat ratio for a human male is 3.2x10^15 Getting back to the app there is huge value in not needing to run the command yourself. Sure it’s wrapped in a UI that comes with “bloat” but ho…

In the human analogy, the human has to be the entire computer too. It's all functional, not much bloat. For the app, the computer is external. It really is bloat.

Re: Airpass – Easily overcome WiFi time limits

#206

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So I tried this out on macOS 26 and the `airport` command is no longer there. There is a `airportd.sb` file, which appears to be some permissions based thing in s-expression/LISP. Weird. Edit: Spun up a macOS 15 VM and I got this: WARNING: The airport command line tool is deprecated and will be removed in a future release. For diagnosing Wi-Fi related issues, use the Wireless Diagnostics app or wdutil command line to…

Looking around briefly, you can replace it with this: `networksetup -setairportpower en0 on && [... set MAC ...] && networksetup -setairportpower en0 off` I think it's pretty safe to assume that modern Macs will always have en0 as the WiFi adapter, but if you wanted, you could use `networksetup -listnetworkserviceorder` to find the associated device.

So this doesn't work if your wifi nic is associated with an SSID. `airport -z` disassociates the SSID.

Can't seem to find a CLI command to do the same in macOS 26, but I haven't looked too hard either.

Re: Airpass – Easily overcome WiFi time limits

#207
post #43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

200 bytes for the business logic. 47MB for the UI & boilerplate around the business logic. I get that this may be the easiest way to develop and publish an application today, but it's sad that this is the direction we have taken in recent years.

I so strongly wish more developers gave even a single shit about this. The current state of desktop app development is truly an embarrassment.

Who is embarrassed? What are the realized harms?

Re: Airpass – Easily overcome WiFi time limits

#208
post #138

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Its called externalized cost and its as real in software as it is IRL

So the cost is there, it's just not paid (directly) by the developer. But we all end up paying someone else's externalized cost, included said developer that is paying some other developers' externalized costs.

Worst offender being Google, who toggled on VP8 / VP9 decoding on YouTube despite the vast majority of devices only having h264 hardware decode.

The aggregate waste in battery wear and watts spent is pretty staggering when you think about it, all so google could spend a few cents less per 100 streams.

Re: Airpass – Easily overcome WiFi time limits

#209
post #46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Modern app bloat in one analogy: Business logic size: ~20 bytes Total app size: ~47 MB = 47,000,000 bytes Bloat factor: 47,000,000 / 20 = 2,350,000 Let’s scale this up and say the business logic is 1 pound. Then the whole app would weigh: 1 lb × 2,350,000 = 2,350,000 pounds What weighs ~2.35 million pounds? - A fully loaded Boeing 747-8: ~987,000 lbs - Another fully loaded 747-8: ~987,000 lbs - A blue whale: ~330,000…

Well, if you COULD ship something across the world on a private 747 with extra features to protect your cargo, and it has nearly no environmental downside and has no meaningful downside vs a smaller airplane… you’d probably do it! There’s no incentive in software to get a smaller, more efficient plane, and plenty of incentive to use the big thing for free that has all the extra features

I think you're conflating "no incentive" (which might be true) with "no downsides" (which is not).
Post reply on HN