Earlier quoted context omitted.
Bunch of unit, functional and E2E tests, just like before LLMs :) Haven't tried with Ruby specifically but works well with JavaScript and other dynamic languages so should work fine with Ruby too.
I wonder if people that loves typescript never wrote tests and that is why they are so fascinated with types for dynamic languages. I guess they have never been really productive.
Agentic Coding Recommendations
201–210 of 210 posts
Re: Agentic Coding Recommendations
#202Gotta say, 100/200 bucks monthly feels prohibitively expensive for even trying out something, particularly something as unproven as code-writing AI, even more particularly when other personal experiences with AI have been at the very least underwhelming, and extra particularly when the whole endeavor is so wrapped up in ethical concerns.
Try Aider with API usage. Learn how to control context size (/clear, /add, /drop). Limit context to 25K. Use whatever model you want (Sonnet 4 or Gemini 2.5 Pro). For simple scripts, it often costs me under $1 to build. I'm working on a bigger tool these days, and I've done lots of prompts, a decent amount of code, over 100 tests, and my running total is right now under $6. I'd suggest learn the basics of using AI to…
I’ve been using it with Aider and am struggling to even spend my first $5.
Re: Agentic Coding Recommendations
#203I stumbled into Agentic Coding in VS Code Nightlys with co-pilot using Claude Sonnet 4 and I've been silly productive. Even when half my day is meetings, you wouldn't be able to tell from my git history. My thinking now is removed from the gory details and is a step or two up. How can I validate the changes are working? Can I understand this code? How should it be structured so I can better understand it? Is there mo…
Your employer, if it is not you, will now expect this level of output.
Re: Agentic Coding Recommendations
#204Earlier quoted context omitted.
I will definitely sleep on agents. Normal LLM use, fine, but I am not giving up reasoning.
> Normal LLM use, fine, but I am not giving up reasoning. Ouch! Reminds me of: - I'm never going to use cell phones. I care about voice quality (me decades ago) - I'm never going to use VoIP. I care about voice quality (everyone but me 2 decades ago). - I'm never going to use a calculator. I am not going to give up on reasoning. - I'm never going to let my kids play with . I care about good manners. https://en.wikipe…
I'm never going to use use Blockchain.
I'm never going to use use NFTs.
Re: Agentic Coding Recommendations
#205Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Normal LLM use, fine, but I am not giving up reasoning. Ouch! Reminds me of: - I'm never going to use cell phones. I care about voice quality (me decades ago) - I'm never going to use VoIP. I care about voice quality (everyone but me 2 decades ago). - I'm never going to use a calculator. I am not going to give up on reasoning. - I'm never going to let my kids play with . I care about good manners. https://en.wikipe…
Sure, keep slowly offloading more and more of your brain to technology. Until you won't be needed anymore.
I don't really get the sentiment. If you're in engineering/computers, you are fundamentally in the business of replacing people with technology. Cloud solutions resulted in people in IT/dev ops losing their jobs. So much SW out there has displaced real people in the last 5 decades.
Do you want to go back to the days of dealing with switchboard operators to make phone calls?
Re: Agentic Coding Recommendations
#206Can someone recommended some source for vibe coding eg. how to prompt it properly, what tools to use? Does someone have any experience on anything other than small projects from scratch?
I had the same question because all my experience with this contradicts the hype. I watched Ronacher's demo from yesterday, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQYXZCUvpIc , and this is it, a well-regarded engineer working on a serious open source project. There's no wizard behind the curtain, it's the thing I've been asking the promoters for. And you should make your own judgment, but I'm just not impressed. It seems to…
Re: Agentic Coding Recommendations
#207Earlier quoted context omitted.
I had the same question because all my experience with this contradicts the hype. I watched Ronacher's demo from yesterday, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQYXZCUvpIc , and this is it, a well-regarded engineer working on a serious open source project. There's no wizard behind the curtain, it's the thing I've been asking the promoters for. And you should make your own judgment, but I'm just not impressed. It seems to…
Agents now are best for writing code, not yet for software engineering.
Re: Agentic Coding Recommendations
#208Re: Agentic Coding Recommendations
#209Earlier quoted context omitted.
Whats your workflow? Ive been playing with Claude Code for personal use. Usually new projects for experimentation. We have Copilot licenses through work so I've been playing around with VS Code agent mode for the last week. Usually using 3.5, 3.7 Sonnet or 04-mini. This is in a large Go project. Its been abysmal at everything other than tests. I've been trying to figure out if I'm just using the tooling wrong but I f…
I really don't get it. I've tested some agents and they can generate boilerplate. It looks quite impressive if you look at the logs, actually seems like an autonomous intelligent agent. But I can run commands on my local linux box that generate boilerplate in seconds. Why do I need to subscribe to access gpu farms for that? Then the agent gets stuck at some simple bug and goes back and forth saying "yes, I figured ou…
I've found the agents incredibly hit and miss. Mostly miss. The likes of Claude Code occasionally does something surprising and it actually works (usually there's a public example it's copied wholly when you research the code it gave you, especially for niche stuff), but then the rest of the time you spend hours wrestling it into submission over something you could do in minutes, all whilst it haemorrhages context sporadically. Even tried adding an additional vector database to the likes of Claude Code to try and get around this, but it's honestly a waste of time in my experiences.
Is it "useless"? For me, yes, probably. I can't find any valid use for an LLM so far in terms of creating new things. What's already been done before? Sure. But why an LLM in that case?
The strangest thing I've seen so far is Claude Code wanting a plugin to copy values from a metadata column in WordPress to then read, which is triggered by a watcher every five minutes—instead of just reading the value when relevant. It could not be wrangled into behaving over this and I gave up.
Took me 2 minutes to do the whole thing by hand, and it worked first try (of course—it's PHP—not complicated compared to Verilog and DSP, at which it is spectacularly bad in its output).
It does very odd things in terms of secrets and Cloudflare Workers too.
The solutions it gives are frequently nonsensical, incomplete, mixes syntax from various languages (which sometimes it catches itself on before giving you the artifact), and almost always wholly in how inefficient the pointless steps to a simple task are.
Giving Claude Code tutorials, docs, and repos of code is usually a shitshow too. I asked their customer support for a refund weeks ago and have heard nothing. All hype and no substance.
I can see how someone without much dev experience might be impressed by its output, especially if they're only asking it to do incredibly simplistic stuff, for which there's plenty of examples and public discourse on troubleshooting bad code, but once you get into wanting to do new things, I just don't see how anyone could think this is ever going to be viable.
I mucked around with autonomous infrastructure via Claude Code too, and just found that it did absolutely bizarre things that made no sense in terms of managing containers relative to logs, suggesting configurations et al. Better off with dumb scripts with your env vars, secrets et al.
Re: Agentic Coding Recommendations
#210Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sure, keep slowly offloading more and more of your brain to technology. Until you won't be needed anymore.
If that is the ultimate outcome, I assure you that your insistence on not using not only is not going to protect you - you'll be the first to be unemployed. I don't really get the sentiment. If you're in engineering/computers, you are fundamentally in the business of replacing people with technology. Cloud solutions resulted in people in IT/dev ops losing their jobs. So much SW out there has displaced real people in…
This happened only in the phantasy world of deluded MBAs who were sold on the narrative of the cloud operators taking over their infrastructure management. If you ever worked on any of the hyperscaler-based infrastructure, it is actually more complex than the more simple on-premise setups people used to have. I am not saying it is bad that way, I actually enjoy working with the cloud more than with on-premise stuff, but just to highlight you are just making such a bad comparison here.