Live data from Hacker News

Apple Debuts iPhone 16e

apple.com

201–210 of 857 posts

Re: Apple Debuts iPhone 16e

#201

At this point there’s only really one thing I want from an iPhone and that’s an option for a 12/13 mini sized device again. Surely those phones didn’t sell so few that it’s not worth doing at all?

I am still using my 13 Mini. I got it, because I knew that it would be the last Mini Apple does.

I plan to use it, until I need to charge the battery every 15 minutes.

Re: Apple Debuts iPhone 16e

#202
Does anyone else long for a new personal device (phone) maker/leader? A real AI phone where if you want you can have a full human like conversation (text, voice & video chat it recognizes gestures & emotions (facial expressions)) with your AI assistant from your lock screen.

I use chatGPT while driving in the car to get things done & as a knowledge base, but I have to open the app to use it (not safe when driving).

I have an iPhone 15 Pro and still with Siri's Apple Not-Intelligent I can only ask Siri one question at a time and I always have to say Hey Siri ask ChatGPT xyz and then to continue to learn more have to say that again with a follow-up question. It's such a terrible UX when compared to opening chatGPT and talking to it, yet again not safe to do so when driving!

Re: Apple Debuts iPhone 16e

#203
post #60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Apple has no problem with self cannibalization. See the iPod or the iPad with keyboard for example.

Counterpoint: removing Hypervisor API from iOS 16, ostensibly to prevent iPads from cannibalizing MacBooks.

Or MacBooks not having touch screens, or iPads being unable to run macOS / macOS apps even if you buy the $350 keyboard that gives it the same exact inputs as a MacBook, or iPads with modems being unable to place calls.

There's all sorts of limitations that seem less like thoughtful design and more like holding back the devices just that bit to make you want another device. You can't just want an iPad Pro, how will you run desktop apps? You can't just want an iPad Mini, how will you call people?

Well, at least the iPads can function as calculators now.

Re: Apple Debuts iPhone 16e

#204
post #75

It is an iPhone 16, inside iPhone 14 Body, Single Camera from iPhone 16, with iPhone 14 OLED Screen, Apple Modem, Without UWB, Minus 1 GPU Core on A18, 7.5W MagSafe Charging same as iPhone 14. Wifi 6 instead of Wifi 7 on iPhone 16. However at $599, higher than the rumoured $499 or $549 pricing. iPhone 14 previously at $599 and iPhone SE at $429 are now gone. Getting rid of iPhone 14 and iPhone SE as they are both usi…

$599, same as the Mac Mini M4 :-)

Yeah, but this has a screen built in and you can actually put it in your pocket.

Re: Apple Debuts iPhone 16e

#205
post #151

It seems that this will cannibalize iPhone 16 sales - it's $200 cheaper, same form factor and internals, with the only difference being the camera, which if you care about you go for the Pro model. However, the price makes for a much more appealing upgrade for anyone who has an older iPhone

This is aimed at the lower end of the market: the pre/postpaid MVNOs and deal hunters. And for kids. The new modem is interesting. How much power around the world is being wasted because Qualcomm's code sucks? Apparently gigawatts per day.

My cell phone has a 3.7v, 2018 mAh battery, for a total of 7.4 watt-hours.

That's enough power to drive a Tesla Model 3 Standard Range Plus a distance of... 55 meters.

Even if Qualcomm's code was solely responsible for completely draining my phone's battery every single day, it would still not be very much power.

Re: Apple Debuts iPhone 16e

#206

At this point there’s only really one thing I want from an iPhone and that’s an option for a 12/13 mini sized device again. Surely those phones didn’t sell so few that it’s not worth doing at all?

Based on previous conversations on this topic, I think the issue is that people don't actually prioritise the mini size above all else.

In other words whatever size the audience is for a mini phone they are further fragmented into people who want a flagship phone vs mid range phone vs budget phone.

And those market segments are too small to make it worth Apple or even most android manufacturers effort.

Re: Apple Debuts iPhone 16e

#207
What I really want Apple to release is a foldable like Google Pixel and Samsung Galaxy’s flagship models.

The idea of having a normal screen on the front but then a second foldable screen inside is a great tradeoff between form and function.

Unfortunately I can’t see Apple releasing this because it harms their tablet sales. Hopefully I’m proven wrong though.

Re: Apple Debuts iPhone 16e

#209
post #131

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No MagSafe, only Qi (not Qi2). 800 nits typical brightness vs. 1000 for the 16, 1200 nits maximum brightness vs. 1600–2000 nits. Notch vs. dynamic island, of course.

Magsafe sticker is is 1$ for a pack of 10 so it's really not a problem.

But you need to align it perfectly.

Re: Apple Debuts iPhone 16e

#210
post #122

Apple leans its weight heavily on controversial smartphone changes and defines trends for the rest of the industry, even when it's not the first company to do so. When it removed the headphone jack, introduced the screen notch, or added a camera bump, everyone followed afterward despite the grumbling. So keeping that in mind, regarding the modem, I remember prior comments about it being near-impossible or extremely d…

> extremely difficult for Apple to cut out Qualcomm

it was extremely difficult, they have been working on this since at least ~6 years, maybe longer and involved buying intel 5G modem business

it also is lacking UWB which either Apple has given up on or is bringing back with future revisions of their modem

Post reply on HN