I don't understand why the editors allowed the engineers' names to be made public. What did they hope to gain by doing this other than making them magnets for harassment and possibly threats?
The young, inexperienced engineers aiding DOGE
201–210 of 1001 posts
Re: The young, inexperienced engineers aiding DOGE
#202Can't believe this is flagged.
Re: The young, inexperienced engineers aiding DOGE
#203Re: The young, inexperienced engineers aiding DOGE
#204yes, existing government systems are insanely complex - that’s part of the problem! the essential complexity is not higher than that of a brain-computer interface, or an interplanetary rocket.
we don’t even know what these kids’ mandate is (also disappointing). but if your general premise is “smart outsiders who are good at engineering are always the wrong people to rework complex, inefficient systems,” i’d like to think you’re on the wrong site.
Re: The young, inexperienced engineers aiding DOGE
#205[flagged]
Re: The young, inexperienced engineers aiding DOGE
#206[flagged]
Re: The young, inexperienced engineers aiding DOGE
#207They have interesting pedigrees: Meta, Palantir, Neuralink, xAI, SpaceX, Databricks, Energize AI. It seems clear where this is going. Data mining and algorithmic (claimed!) efficiency improvements while working on an essential and critical production system. Since these people claim that "AI" does not need to respect privacy and copyright, perhaps they'll also train a model on this. Where are the Democrats on all thi…
Re: The young, inexperienced engineers aiding DOGE
#208There's no two ways about it.
Sigh...
Re: The young, inexperienced engineers aiding DOGE
#209Are such drastic action appropriate given the current state of the US? The US probably hasn't been this economically dominant since after WWII. Feels like Chesterton fences are getting torn up left and right by people too young and incurious to possibly understand why those fences might be there.