201–210 of 287 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
What I understand is that it's GPT 6 that just went into training, and that GPT 5 is complete and being delayed until after the U.S. election.
This is pure speculation, right?
Opus remained better than GPT for me, even after the release of GPT-4o. VERY happy to see an even further improvement beyond that, Claude is a terrific product and given the news that GPT-5 only began its training several weeks ago I don't see any situation where Anthropic is dethroned in the near term. There are only two parts of Anthropic's offering I'm not a fan of: - Lack of conversation sharing: I had a conversa…
I've had way better success with GPT-4o than claude. I wonder why
Earlier quoted context omitted.
https://openai.com/index/openai-board-forms-safety-and-secur... (May 28th) > OpenAI has recently begun training its next frontier model and we anticipate the resulting systems to bring us to the next level of capabilities on our path to AGI.
No doubt openai have been training big models for the last year. If “gpt5” is only just starting it means recent training runs have had disappointing results and have been passed off as “Gpt4o” or whatever. The value of all the AI companies is predicated on high chance of AGI, and gpt5 failing to be revolutionary may pop the whole bubble (+10 trillion of market cap)
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I've had way better success with GPT-4o than claude. I wonder why
Personal prompting style, I imagine,
I would be confident in stating that half the people who complain about a model are actually just suffering from poor prompting.
Opus remained better than GPT for me, even after the release of GPT-4o. VERY happy to see an even further improvement beyond that, Claude is a terrific product and given the news that GPT-5 only began its training several weeks ago I don't see any situation where Anthropic is dethroned in the near term. There are only two parts of Anthropic's offering I'm not a fan of: - Lack of conversation sharing: I had a conversa…
I had subscriptions for both and I would fire off questions to both of them and see which one I liked more and I consistently liked the ChatGPT ones more. I canceled my subscription last week for Claude. I am super happy that Anthropic continues to push the envelope on this and I hope to re-subscribe to them in the future.
I wish they'd implement branching conversations like in ChatGPT. And convenient message editing, that doesn't paste large chunks of text as an non-editable attachment or break formatting. Seems like such a simple thing to do, relative to developing an AI, yet the minor differences in the UI/UX are what prevents me from using claude a lot more.
Opus remained better than GPT for me, even after the release of GPT-4o. VERY happy to see an even further improvement beyond that, Claude is a terrific product and given the news that GPT-5 only began its training several weeks ago I don't see any situation where Anthropic is dethroned in the near term. There are only two parts of Anthropic's offering I'm not a fan of: - Lack of conversation sharing: I had a conversa…
To each their own, but I still prefer ChatGPT. The UI for Claude is terrible in my opinion. I had subscriptions for both and I would fire off questions to both of them and see which one I liked more and I consistently liked the ChatGPT ones more. I canceled my subscription last week for Claude. I am super happy that Anthropic continues to push the envelope on this and I hope to re-subscribe to them in the future.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
To each their own, but I still prefer ChatGPT. The UI for Claude is terrible in my opinion. I had subscriptions for both and I would fire off questions to both of them and see which one I liked more and I consistently liked the ChatGPT ones more. I canceled my subscription last week for Claude. I am super happy that Anthropic continues to push the envelope on this and I hope to re-subscribe to them in the future.
If it's really only the UI that's bothering you, why not use a web UI such as Open WebUI?
If anyone would like to try it for coding in VSCode, I just added it to http://double.bot on v93 (AI coding assistant). Feels quite strong so far and got a few prompts that I know failed with gpt4o. fyi for anyone testing this in their product, their docs are wrong, it's claude-3-5-sonnet-20240620, not claude-3.5-sonnet-20240620.
What is the training cutoff for 3.5 Sonnet?