Blueprint health protocol

Post by oh_sigh » Wed, Jan 03, 2024, 8:33 PM UTC

Podgajski wrote: post #167

kkoncevicius wrote: post #34

I love what the guy is doing. It is a one-man experiment that would be very very hard to reproduce, or even get ethics approval and funding for, by a research lab. But on the other hand, I get a sense that the public side of his results are overblown. For example, my field is epigenetics, so I had a look at his "epigenetic clock" results. He uses "DunedinPACE" to track the rate of aging and his result is supposedly 0…

This guy spent so much trying not to die that he’s not living at all.

How is he not living? What would he need to do to really live? Go get drunk at a bar? Stay up until 3am playing video games?

Post by oh_sigh » Wed, Jan 03, 2024, 8:39 PM UTC

Shekelphile wrote: post #31

thatguysaguy wrote: post #4

I have no idea whether his stuff will work but I'm glad people are trying wacky stuff to find out.

There is a very weird lack of interest in slowing down or reversing aging in the scientific/medical community in general. To me it seems like it should be a top priority. Life is extremely short and extending our lives shouldn't be a terribly hard feat given there are plenty of biologically immortal and long lived organisms all over our planet.

Life doesn't seem short. Heck, humans are some of the longest lived mammals in the world. I suspect people only say life is short because they are counting the days ahead of them and comparing it to the days behind them - not considering the total number of days. I bet very few 10-year-olds would say life is short, but maybe a lot of 60-year-olds would.

Re: Blueprint health protocol

Re: Blueprint health protocol