Live data from Hacker News

Email obfuscation rendered almost ineffective against ChatGPT

bulkninja.notion.site

201–204 of 204 posts

Re: Email obfuscation rendered almost ineffective against ChatGPT

#201
post #130

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why on earth did you post someone's unobfuscated email address if that someone clearly does not want that?

private information is not to be put on the internet in the clear. that's why we laugh at "data breaches" in the form of public s3 buckets and the likes.

It wasn't in the clear, you did that.

Re: Email obfuscation rendered almost ineffective against ChatGPT

#202
post #180

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Still, you can get a collection of like 10-20 regexes for most common types of obfuscation, and that will solve the problem like 90% of the time. And it is much cheaper, computationally, than running LLM on the whole content.

I always felt email obfuscation is just a cargo cult and the reduction in spam is only from improvements in anti-spam tech. I never obfuscated my address and pretty much haven't seen spam since first days of Gmail. And very little even before then thanks to SpamAssassin. Also raw email addresses can be easily harvested from git repos, mailing list archives and possibly other sources. A lot of technical people who cho…

It is not a cargo cult if you use methods that are more difficult. Can a LLM figure this one out?

abc 132 pyrogenics dndex vufwd bocjz pogl

How about this one?

password vectorization collins 2019 64k little, clotured aerobrakings audiologically cumins ashpans amphibian acciaccatura alligated denunciates burnouts babbles briskier cimbaloms brahmanist adiposes bridgeboards

Obfuscation can be as obscure as you want it to be. If you invent your own no spammer will take the trouble to figure it out. Then again... not many readers will either.

Re: Email obfuscation rendered almost ineffective against ChatGPT

#203
post #180

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I always felt email obfuscation is just a cargo cult and the reduction in spam is only from improvements in anti-spam tech. I never obfuscated my address and pretty much haven't seen spam since first days of Gmail. And very little even before then thanks to SpamAssassin. Also raw email addresses can be easily harvested from git repos, mailing list archives and possibly other sources. A lot of technical people who cho…

It is not a cargo cult if you use methods that are more difficult. Can a LLM figure this one out? abc 132 pyrogenics dndex vufwd bocjz pogl How about this one? password vectorization collins 2019 64k little, clotured aerobrakings audiologically cumins ashpans amphibian acciaccatura alligated denunciates burnouts babbles briskier cimbaloms brahmanist adiposes bridgeboards Obfuscation can be as obscure as you want it t…

Your examples are useless because humans would not understand them either.

Re: Email obfuscation rendered almost ineffective against ChatGPT

#204
post #54

For all the comments saying obfuscation is pointless. I have an email address listed publicly on a project website with basic obfuscation (something like x y com), plus a bit of javascript to automatically deobfuscate it in the browser. It's been there for years and never received a spam email. But then I have another address which I've been similarly careful with but have also used on a few registrations and that ge…

Sheesh just got its first one on the same day as posting this. Feels like someone's personally taken the time.
Post reply on HN