Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is why dissolution isn't some whopsey-doodle word. When there's nothing left, there's nothing left. If that is a risk, including in that is your private healthcare provision, leave this stuff up to the 20 year olds that don't have the health concerns. Coddled might be too diminutive of a phrase, but if it's a risk you can't live with by your life expectations, don't get involved. Pick another job on the market.…
The whole issue with this premise is that someone has to bear the risk. There are no 20 year olds who know with certainty that they don't or will not soon have health concerns that require insurance. Anyone could be get hit with a car walking across the street or get a photon to break some DNA in their skin and cause a melanoma. 20 year olds are not invincible or always in perfect working order.
Trucking startup Convoy closes operations with no buyer
201–210 of 639 posts
Re: Trucking startup Convoy closes operations with no buyer
#202To think that 1 year ago they were aggressively spamming me for an engineering position there. How you go from "hyper growth mode" (according to the recruiter email) to closed operations within 13 months?
Re: Trucking startup Convoy closes operations with no buyer
#203start-up idea if anyone is bored: disrupt car shipping. When I moved from Seattle to Raleigh shipping my car was BY FAR the biggest headache. It's a 20th century business where you have to call people, who will bid for you, and you have no idea if your bid is accepted. Agents will promise a low price to get your business, then tell you a week later that bid was too low, you need to double it. I eventually just gave u…
Businesses like these are hard to "disrupt" because despite all the fancy websites and apps, pricing algorithms, scheduling, reminders, live video feeds and whatever else you can build, underneath it all the success or failure still depends on some guy showing up at your house, picking up your car and trucking it across the country. Unless you can automate that part nothing will fundamentally change.
Re: Trucking startup Convoy closes operations with no buyer
#204Earlier quoted context omitted.
Ex-Convoy employee here: if a company is shutting down, it obviously can't provide severance. It's not a matter of class or not.
> if a company is shutting down, it obviously can't provide severance Not really true. The company is owned by its shareholders, and they may choose to use funds belonging to the company (after paying outstanding obligations) to pay severance, or they may divide the funds among themselves. If there are no funds, they can choose to invest more to pay severance. Obviously they're unlikely to want to do that, but it's n…
If they can do this, they can pay salaries another month. Making a go/no go call at the edge is difficult. It sounds like Convoy thought it was getting a loan that didn’t come through.
Put another way: if the CEO shut down the company while loan negotiations were in place, it would have zeroed out the common stock while giving preferred investors a pay-out (in addition to everyone some severance).
Re: Trucking startup Convoy closes operations with no buyer
#205Earlier quoted context omitted.
"As I just shared on our call, I think the world of you." Just not enough to offer any severance or healthcare. #TruckYeah!
The company is shutting down because they ran out of money... where do you think this magical severance pay is going to come from?
Re: Trucking startup Convoy closes operations with no buyer
#206Earlier quoted context omitted.
It is interesting to see that employees of Convoy aren't saying bad things about the CEO. But people on the outside who don't know the CEO are saying bad things. Usually it is the reverse.
Stockholm syndrome is a thing: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stockholm_syndrome
Re: Trucking startup Convoy closes operations with no buyer
#207Earlier quoted context omitted.
While true, most of these startups that have already found product/market fit and go bust are operating off of unrealistically rosy projections. Did this company need to burn their entire round in a single year? Probably not. Could they have established themselves with lower operating expenses and still grown over time? Probably.
For the sake of argument, assume your contentions are true. Now how do you draw a line from that to the probability that the technical team that has been let go is not high quality?
People who can't asses fair value of a business from a discounted cashflow perspective shouldn't be running a company. It's usually financially ignorant people like this that lead the business down a dark path. The prior round valuation, and thus the implicitly underwritten future expectations of growth, is evidence enough that something along these lines happened here.
Re: Trucking startup Convoy closes operations with no buyer
#208Earlier quoted context omitted.
If things are dire enough to close up shop now, they probably were dire enough to close up shop 2 months ago, and you can use the cash to give your employees some runway for finding new employment.
Entitlement is more prevalent than we think.
Re: Trucking startup Convoy closes operations with no buyer
#209Earlier quoted context omitted.
Of course they will. What is the magic that separates success from failure that apparently only magically appears within the last 4 weeks with operating capital in the bank? Move your time tables up by 4-8 weeks, including funding raises and closing operations, and none of this is an issue.
If you can still operate the business for another 8 weeks, there's a chance that things will still work out, and it's pretty pessimistic to preemptively shut it down because you assume you're going to fail. Pessimists don't generally find themselves in the role of founder/CEO of a startup in the first place.
Manic founders who insist that a rescue will come right up until the last second often leave people feeling burned and don't get as many second chances when things don't go well.
Re: Trucking startup Convoy closes operations with no buyer
#210Earlier quoted context omitted.
>CEO said there'll be no severance or healthcare. Classy. Learning a lot about how certain people treat their employees during these last couple of admittedly insane years. Good for future reference, I guess - though not much solace now. I feel for the employees. Edit: Wow, more responses than I thought! I admit that the tone of my comment was too reactionary, but my opinion stands. I won't modify the original commen…
Startups are not established businesses. They are inherently risky ventures. If you want to be coddled and showered with benefits, go join a Fortune 500. Startups are not for you.
This is not normal behavior for any company, and you should run away from anyone trying to convince you otherwise. The people responsible should be treated like pariahs.