Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Nearly 14 years in, where exactly is this “ton of real world utility”? I don't think cryptocurrency has much value, but I think block chain has lots of potential for trading things that have unique ids and are owned by many people. I paid $1500 for research on a title claim and my lawyer came back with "It's looks solid, but I'd get the title insurance just in case". If property deeds were on the block chain then i…
> If property deeds were on the block chain then it'd be trivial. True, but then a ton of other things would be much, much more difficult. Like, what happens if Joe has the deed to a home, but then Joe dies, and nobody has the key to his wallet? If you have some kind of way, on the blockchain, to solve this problem, and reassign the property without Joe’s private key, then what you have is a situation where human dec…
I have thought about this and it's solveable. Physical goods have to have some sort of "sanctioned violence" to enforce, so there is always a government. They have a public key that is known and publish updates. So if something gets legally confiscated, there is a message published by the government that amends the chain. "The owner of X is now Y".
> I don’t see what advantage blockchain has here.
Because it unifies ownership under a central mechanism and you don't need to wait in line at a government office. You have an API and a log. It doesn't really need to be distributed just public I guess, but having the ability to have a private copy for reference would be a benefit.