Live data from Hacker News

Shrinkflation Tracker

shrinkflation.io

201–210 of 240 posts

Re: Shrinkflation Tracker

#201
post #97

Another source of shrinkflation is changing ingredients. Something that used to be 50% water is now 75% water as an example. Another is changing from olive oil to canola or palm or, and things like that.

I’ve also seen a change in packaging, example: changing from a glass bottle to a plastic bottle.

Re: Shrinkflation Tracker

#202

The worst part of shrinkflation is restaurants who have reduced the sizes of their meals, in my opinion. I’ve seen this quite a lot in everything from fast casual places like Cava to locally owned establishments.

That may not be a bad thing per se. In plenty of restaurants the amount of food in a serving is way too large for me and the alternative probably was to raise prices. In restaurants food isn't usually the high margin product, that's alcohol.

Most fast casual places don’t sell much alcohol.

Re: Shrinkflation Tracker

#203
post #192

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's basically 'race to the bottom' but that term is not very inspirational. It's not evoking any kind of reaction in the masses.

Neither is "enshittification." Only HN and some tech bloggers even use it as far as I know, and mostly just to be able to imply something is "turning into shit" while pretending to use a precise term of art. But it isn't, it's a poop joke.

[dead]

Re: Shrinkflation Tracker

#204
post #199

In an ideal world, one UPC code would identify only one product with one set of ingredients and one weight. Want to make a "+20% free!" package? New UPC! Want to change the contents from 16% cacao to 14% cacao and some more sugar? Sure, new UPC. The manufacturers would have to publish the contents for each UPC in a machine readable format. Then the retailers would have to publish daily prices, again in a machine reda…

I thought this too, re: for Amazon review farming, but products are never homogeneous from the start. All products have multiple component suppliers, with different tolerances/varieties, where the components are judged "close enough". Suppliers come and go. And even if it's a single large supplier, they may have different farms/factories/etc so you won't even be getting homogeneous components from them.

Then extend product codes until every single individual batch - or even every single individual item - has a unique ID. Store information hierarchically if you have to to save space, but we have the technology today to track every single component of our entire supply chain. The automotive, aerospace, and defense industries already do this. The food industry even has the processes in place, they just only do the bare minimum to execute a recall when the FDA calls them on their shit. Even pet food can pull it off! All we have to do is make manufacturers go that rest of the way.

Re: Shrinkflation Tracker

#205

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Actually, free markets do lead to better products. But they cost more than the worse products. Look at coffee. The gradual shift from Arabica to more Robusta beans over a generation. Each year, an imperceptible shift was taken that, over decades, lead to coffee that tastes terrible. Opening the door for companies like Starbucks and a ton of gourmet roasters to compete. But properly roasted, single origin coffee costs…

The only thing that Starbucks did for coffee was that children now also love to drink it. In fact their coffee doesn't taste like coffee, but more like mocha/hazelnut ice cream.

Are you talking about their black coffee? Or their other sorts of drinks that are often less than 50% actual coffee? Because if anything, the usual complaint about literal coffee at Starbucks from people who like coffee is it tastes too much like coffee, in the sense of being over-roasted and uninteresting. Even their blonde roast is still at best a medium roast at any other modern roaster.

Re: Shrinkflation Tracker

#206

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It is already open information that pretty much every seller of everything in the whole world tries to sell for as high of a price that they think can get. And that purchasing power of currencies will go down over time.

> And that purchasing power of currencies will go down over time. This is only true when you keep printing more of it. The creation of currency outpacing the creation of value is inflation.

Inflation existed for currencies that were on the gold standard too.

There was over a decade of QE which the rainmakers said would totally cause inflation. It didn’t.

Then there were supply side shocks which would definitely only cause transitory inflation. Also wrong.

Then we learned that sentiment causes it, and in the middle of terrible sentiment inflation went down.

Every complex problem has a simple, intuitive, easy to understand wrong answer. It is not an exaggeration to say that we do not know what causes inflation.

Re: Shrinkflation Tracker

#207

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Did they get smaller or just fewer in the pack?

The eggs got smaller. BJ Novak did the research, https://youtu.be/TlXLCrzpToo?si=0i6G9NFSbr9aKiaN

Link with story cued (at 4:21): https://youtu.be/TlXLCrzpToo?t=261

Re: Shrinkflation Tracker

#208

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Just one more factor to consider, some ingredients are no longer available. Trans fats are a good example of this. They used to be the prime replacement for saturated fats. Now, in the US, they are effectively banned. This hit oreos. [1] [1] https://www.orlandosentinel.com/2006/01/02/manufacturers-tri...

Fair point. Were oreos always palm oil or were they lard back in the day? The fracking industry has made guar gum too expensive to use as a food emulsifier. I know someone who reacts to xanthan gum (which has all but replaced guar) and she's not a happy camper, because it's in fucking everything.

> Were oreos always palm oil or were they lard back in the day?

They did use lard till mid 90s.

https://news.cornell.edu/stories/2008/02/getting-lard-out-ko...

Re: Shrinkflation Tracker

#209
post #189

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The only thing that Starbucks did for coffee was that children now also love to drink it. In fact their coffee doesn't taste like coffee, but more like mocha/hazelnut ice cream.

Today’s Starbucks is well removed from its origins. Starbucks was never great coffee, but I’ve heard it started out pretty decent. Much like how McDonalds, KFC, etc started by making decent food so did Starbucks. Add 40+ years of optimizing for the bottom line and the average person’s pallet and you get a very different product.

Anecdotally I believe McDonald’s actually does very well on blind taste tests.

Re: Shrinkflation Tracker

#210
post #168

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Do we put that under the shrinkflation umbrella No we call it just that, enshittification.

>No we call it just that, enshittification. I'll be glad when this juvenile meme finally passes out of Hacker News' system.

I'll do my best to keep it going, unless you have a better term. Enshittification clearly communicates the point trying to be made.
Post reply on HN