Live data from Hacker News

Chandrayaan-3 Soft-landing [video]

isro.gov.in

201–210 of 542 posts

Re: Chandrayaan-3 Soft-landing [video]

#201

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why such a long political speech and no views from onboard camera?

Unfortunately all the national space agencies seem to suffer from this. Both NASA and ESA also seem to think that people are tuning in to watch the smarmy politician talk rather than the robot making its way to space/landing on another body. Had the same issue with JWST for example.

I can imagine that this is a HN-bubble thing. Most people would probably get bored from just seeing some live footage.

Re: Chandrayaan-3 Soft-landing [video]

#203
post #47

Not asking rhetorically but why is this a big deal? Is it because it's going to the south pole? What are some other benefits to be gained from this?

Besides what others said, it gets extra spice from the fact Russia failed to do the same just days ago.

Agree.

The quicker russians will get rid of putin infestation the sooner this disgrace will end.

Re: Chandrayaan-3 Soft-landing [video]

#204
post #201

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Unfortunately all the national space agencies seem to suffer from this. Both NASA and ESA also seem to think that people are tuning in to watch the smarmy politician talk rather than the robot making its way to space/landing on another body. Had the same issue with JWST for example.

I can imagine that this is a HN-bubble thing. Most people would probably get bored from just seeing some live footage.

SpaceX livestreams didn't get super popular for having a politician on them. They got popular for showing exactly what's happening with enthusiastic presenters narrating it.

Most people find speeches and politicians boring. They wanna see rockets flying, robots moving, etc.

Re: Chandrayaan-3 Soft-landing [video]

#207
post #201

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Unfortunately all the national space agencies seem to suffer from this. Both NASA and ESA also seem to think that people are tuning in to watch the smarmy politician talk rather than the robot making its way to space/landing on another body. Had the same issue with JWST for example.

I can imagine that this is a HN-bubble thing. Most people would probably get bored from just seeing some live footage.

That is condescending nonsense. Pretty much everybody would prefer to see rocks from outer space than hearing politicians congratulating themselves and the unity of our country.

Re: Chandrayaan-3 Soft-landing [video]

#208
post #201

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I can imagine that this is a HN-bubble thing. Most people would probably get bored from just seeing some live footage.

SpaceX livestreams didn't get super popular for having a politician on them. They got popular for showing exactly what's happening with enthusiastic presenters narrating it. Most people find speeches and politicians boring. They wanna see rockets flying, robots moving, etc.

[deleted]

Re: Chandrayaan-3 Soft-landing [video]

#209
post #201

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Unfortunately all the national space agencies seem to suffer from this. Both NASA and ESA also seem to think that people are tuning in to watch the smarmy politician talk rather than the robot making its way to space/landing on another body. Had the same issue with JWST for example.

I can imagine that this is a HN-bubble thing. Most people would probably get bored from just seeing some live footage.

Nope. Same reaction from a wide variety of people including my wife who's not in tech and doesn't know what HN or YCombinator are. She was like "let the team speak already!"

Re: Chandrayaan-3 Soft-landing [video]

#210
post #175
post #47

Not asking rhetorically but why is this a big deal? Is it because it's going to the south pole? What are some other benefits to be gained from this?

[flagged]

So the mission alone is unimpressive in your opinion? If you were to weed out who did this and only focus on the what, would you not have an inch of wonder and applaud the efforts?
Post reply on HN