Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

GPT-4

openai.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

201–210 of 1001 posts

Re: GPT-4

#201

Post by spullara »

helloplanets wrote: post #92

Asking ChatGPT Plus whether the model it's using is GPT-4 responds with the following: > No, I am not GPT-4. As of March 2023, there is no official announcement or release of GPT-4 by OpenAI. I am an earlier version of the GPT series, specifically a large language model trained by OpenAI. Am I missing something here? Maybe this specific answer (which I'm pretty sure is a prewritten thing on top of the actual LLM) is…

As of now I don't think they have updated ChatGPTPlus with GPT-4. It will likely appear in the model dropdown when it is released.

Re: GPT-4

#203

Post by jononomo »

I taught the LSAT for several years. A score of 163 on the LSAT is the lowest score that is considered a "good score" -- i.e., a score that gives you a shot at getting into a decent law school.

Re: GPT-4

#204

Post by _yb2s »

Most of the comments here are denial and goalpost shifting... GPT-4 has different strengths and weaknesses from humans, but it is now in the general realm of human intelligence vs being far below that with GPT-3.

Another jump past GPT-4 of the same magnitude, would greatly surpass human cognitive abilities and present a danger to humanity.

Re: GPT-4

#205

Post by James_Henry »

anileated wrote: post #182
teruakohatu wrote: post #26

Access is invite only for the API, and rate limited for paid GPT+. > gpt-4 has a context length of 8,192 tokens. We are also providing limited access to our 32,768–context (about 50 pages of text) version, gpt-4-32k, which will also be updated automatically over time (current version gpt-4-32k-0314, also supported until June 14). Pricing is $0.06 per 1K prompt tokens and $0.12 per 1k completion tokens. The context le…

Will any of the profits be shared with original authors whose work powers the model?

Which authors? Machine Learning research authors?

Re: GPT-4

#206

Post by chinaman425 »

ml_basics wrote: post #136

From the paper: > Given both the competitive landscape and the safety implications of large-scale models like GPT-4, this report contains no further details about the architecture (including model size), hardware, training compute, dataset construction, training method, or similar. I'm curious whether they have continued to scale up model size/compute significantly or if they have managed to make significant innovati…

[dead]

Re: GPT-4

#207

Post by bespokedevelopr »

afavour wrote: post #86

> What are the implications for society when general thinking, reading, and writing becomes like Chess? I think going from LSAT to general thinking is still a very, very big leap. Passing exams is a really fascinating benchmark but by their nature these exams are limited in scope, have very clear assessment criteria and a lot of associated and easily categorized data (like example tests). General thought (particularl…

> Passing exams is a really fascinating benchmark but by their nature these exams are limited in scope, have very clear assessment criteria and a lot of associated and easily categorized data

I know I’m not the first to say this, but this is also a generalization of many jobs performed right now.

Follow the template, click the boxes, enter the text/data in the standard format, submit before 4pm. Come in tomorrow and do it again.

Re: GPT-4

#208

Post by megaman821 »

la64710 wrote: post #140

It is amazing how this crowd in HN reacts to AI news coming out of OpenAI compared to other competitors like Google or FB. Today there was another news about Google releasing their AI in GCP and mostly the comments were negative. The contrast is clearly visible and without any clear explanation for this difference I have to suspect that maybe something is being artificially done to boost one against the other.

Google had an AI announcement where you could neither use it or even signup for a wait list to use it. What sort of response is an announcement like that supposed to get?

Re: GPT-4

#209

Post by bfeynman »

diimdeep wrote: post #164

Is there law in U.S. that made OpenAI implement this in their TOS ? (i) Export Controls. The Services may not be used in or for the benefit of, exported, or re-exported (a) into any U.S. embargoed countries (collectively, the “Embargoed Countries”) or (b) to anyone on the U.S. Treasury Department’s list of Specially Designated Nationals, any other restricted party lists (existing now or in the future) identified by t…

this is common federal level thing.

Re: GPT-4

#210

Post by nutanc »

The most important question is, what new applications can be developed using GPT4 which couldn't have been developed using GPT3.5?
Post reply on HN