[flagged]
It’s like going back to the 1930s and saying “why is it ok to make fun of the Irish but when I joke about Jews being a menace to society they take it seriously?”
201–210 of 713 posts
[flagged]
It’s like going back to the 1930s and saying “why is it ok to make fun of the Irish but when I joke about Jews being a menace to society they take it seriously?”
So comedy cannot be offensive anymore? When did that happen?
No, comedy can still be offensive. Anyone suggesting comedians can't be offensive is lying. Comedians routinely punch down, and routinely sell out shows. The believe that comedian's can't be offensive is a shtick they are using to market their shows to an audience. It's all advertising and marketing, and the gullible eat it up because it feeds into their bias.
How can you tell where down is though? If the group you're punching has enough clout to get you in trouble, it probably wasn't down.
Uncharacteristically off-topic comment from me, I guess, but when do humans get to a point where we no longer have to appeal to the lowest common denominator? How are our relationships supposed to improve if we dub anything that makes us uncomfortable as "taboo" and steer clear of it? I get that on the Internet there is a lot of anonymity (though less than there used to be) that folks tend to abuse, but at the same t…
Agreed, as a society we need to increase our resilience to opinions we may find uncomfortable.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Are you suggesting that Twitch should ignore accounts that violate the ToS, so long as it was a computer that violated the terms as opposed to a person?
[flagged]
So.... Machine Learning is a thing.
> That's the whole point behind bans, is it not?
No, it may be one point behind imposing bans but it is not the whole (only) point. People can also learn from watching other's make mistakes. Bans communicate to people other than the person getting banned that something is unacceptable.
In this case it seems to communicate that "but it is not a person it's a bot" will not be a srong enough reason to break their rules and escape a ban.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
For a joke generator, making an offensive joke that gets the generator banned from the primary source it uses to reach users seems pretty high up their on the range of negative possible outcomes. That's the point of the comment, if you were applying AI in more serious scenarios, would this be an AI confidently advising a doctor to overdose a patient, or advising a judge to incarcerate someone based on racist inferenc…
> For a joke generator I'm confused, I thought it was supposed to be generating Seinfeld episodes, not jokes?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Are you suggesting that Twitch should ignore accounts that violate the ToS, so long as it was a computer that violated the terms as opposed to a person?
[flagged]
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Agreed, as a society we need to increase our resilience to opinions we may find uncomfortable.
We've totally abandoned the concept of "It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it."
The sea-lion cartoon has stuck around for a reason.
If you click through to the mirror from the /r/livestreamfail page, the clip actually comes across (to me) as making fun of the people who make those kinds of jokes.
I saw it as a joke about an 80s/90s comedian being dropped into the 21st century and bombing a set trying to use old material. It's not a bad premise for a joke and could probably even work IRL if you polish it up. It's too bad they mentioned the T-word though, I guess you're not allowed to say that anymore even in passing.