Earlier quoted context omitted.
It really depends on the business you run. If you run the local electric company, and you read in the paper that some guy in your service area has been doing terrible things, do you turn off his power? Cloudflare sees their anti-DDoS services as a similar infrastructure-level service, and while you might not agree with that (I'm not sure I do either), it's not immediately unreasonable.
Is CF a utility in that way? I think you can argue that their DDOS-mitigation might be. But that comes with the additional benefit of hiding the origin. This resembles a post-forwarder service or a bank that knows the customer's real identity, but provides a way for them to conduct business without exposing it. Is there a good-faith argument that this service is a public utility and should be provided even if the cus…
I ran the worlds largest DDoS-for-Hire empire and Cloudflare helped
201–210 of 244 posts
Re: I ran the worlds largest DDoS-for-Hire empire and Cloudflare helped
#202Earlier quoted context omitted.
Cloudflare still protects all those forums which harm people. Kiwifarms is the only one which was sensationized by the twitter crowd. Look at crime.to. They still send bomb threats [1], exchange stolen credit card data [2], harass people to the point where they lose their houses [3] (SWATing, breaking in into their house and much more included), and probably more on a daily basis. Still protected by cloudflare. Prett…
Twitter hosts Antifa types who use it to recruit and coordinate political violence. Takes about 2 minutes to find an example, so they clearly don't moderate this stuff: https://nitter.net/zelda_in_black Let's disconnect Twitter from the Internet! The same people gravely concerned about an infrastructure website being neutral are perfectly fine being on a social media platform that's used for coordinating all kinds of…
Re: I ran the worlds largest DDoS-for-Hire empire and Cloudflare helped
#203New conspiracy theory: all these drama about absolutely irrelevant websites like 8chan[1] and kiwifarms are to distract from the fact that cloudflare has killed anonymity on the internet. Since 2011 or so, browsing any website behind cloudflare over Tor or pretty much shared IP address got you essentially blocked. You would have to fill out a captcha to even see the front page, and not just any captcha, but the worst one which almost never works when on a shared connection: recaptcha. THEN you had to open up the cdn.myshitwebsite.com and repeat the same bullshit, and then you can see images, css, scripts, whatever on the site. ONLY in 2018 they fixed this (it was always possible to bypass it by changing your user agent to a specific string and such things, but almost nobody knew about this), and then broke it again, I'm not sure what the current state is. Then around 2020, a bunch of cloudflare imitators popped up, which includes having the pointless captcha at the front of pages. Cloudflare literally killed Tor, it was solely their fault.
1. "But oh no, a jihad thing was posted on it", same with facebook but 1000x worse
Re: I ran the worlds largest DDoS-for-Hire empire and Cloudflare helped
#204The deplatforming logic is practical but pretty shaky as a long term strategy. Kiwifarms absolutely may have been a despicable place causing real harm to people. In that case, the police should initiate a request to take them down that Cloudflare or ISPs etc. are obligated to follow. The problem is the government is completely ineffective and regularly offloads their responsibility to platforms like Facebook, Cloudfl…
You're focusing so hard on the rights of kiwifarms that you completely forget that cloudflare also has rights. Cloudflare has the liberty of association, and that includes the right to terminate contracts with others who actively harm Cloudflare and its costumers. And if Kiwifarms sending out bytes to the internet is free speech, then compelling cloudflare to send those same bytes is impernissible forced speech.
Re: I ran the worlds largest DDoS-for-Hire empire and Cloudflare helped
#205Earlier quoted context omitted.
Cloudflare still protects all those forums which harm people. Kiwifarms is the only one which was sensationized by the twitter crowd. Look at crime.to. They still send bomb threats [1], exchange stolen credit card data [2], harass people to the point where they lose their houses [3] (SWATing, breaking in into their house and much more included), and probably more on a daily basis. Still protected by cloudflare. Prett…
While working in security, about 80% of attacks were hidden behind Clouflare. And guess what... they never bothered by my complains.
Re: I ran the worlds largest DDoS-for-Hire empire and Cloudflare helped
#206Earlier quoted context omitted.
Twitter hosts Antifa types who use it to recruit and coordinate political violence. Takes about 2 minutes to find an example, so they clearly don't moderate this stuff: https://nitter.net/zelda_in_black Let's disconnect Twitter from the Internet! The same people gravely concerned about an infrastructure website being neutral are perfectly fine being on a social media platform that's used for coordinating all kinds of…
None of that is recruiting and coordinating political violence. It's hyperbolic and absurd but the only thing any of the posts in there proposed is for people to get armed, trained, and organized. I see posts like this from their political opposition all the time. Neither is organizing or coordinating violence and neither is remotely illegal or threatening.
Re: I ran the worlds largest DDoS-for-Hire empire and Cloudflare helped
#207The linked post by Prince is pretty frustrating. “This is not our stance, but we do it anyway for all the reasons we just said are bullshit.” I have a ton of respect for Prince but this spineless double standards stuff is BS. PS: I have no idea what the deal is with Kiwifarms and frankly I don’t care. If it’s really that bad then we need to have a judge order an injunction.
Re: I ran the worlds largest DDoS-for-Hire empire and Cloudflare helped
#208Earlier quoted context omitted.
Cloudflare’s line seems to be where bodily harm comes into play (e.g. Kiwifarms people enabling SWATing via doxxing, stalking by mobs, etc) which is above and beyond just normal criminal activity. The situations really are not very similar.
And yet they continue to work with innumerable other services causing bodily harm. This was all about countering the negative publicity.
Re: I ran the worlds largest DDoS-for-Hire empire and Cloudflare helped
#209JUST ONE SINGLE NOTE: Cloudflare is a private company responsible for a product that they sell which they can choose not to sell to someone as is any company's rights. The Fire department is a public sector entity, funded by our taxes, and we don't have any choice in which fire department we choose. Anyone can come up with a cloudflare competitor for nazi materials, they have all the ability, money, and ability to bu…
Re: I ran the worlds largest DDoS-for-Hire empire and Cloudflare helped
#210The deplatforming logic is practical but pretty shaky as a long term strategy. Kiwifarms absolutely may have been a despicable place causing real harm to people. In that case, the police should initiate a request to take them down that Cloudflare or ISPs etc. are obligated to follow. The problem is the government is completely ineffective and regularly offloads their responsibility to platforms like Facebook, Cloudfl…
That approach is fairly easy to work around. Just make sure your site is in a country whose police cannot issue requests that Cloudflare is obligated to follow. For added protection pick a country that your victims are not in, ideally one that does not have good relations with the US or the countries of your victims so there is little law enforcement cooperation between them.
> A private company should not be making decisions on essentially freedom of speech
I'd much rather see private companies doing it than see just government doing it.
Consider a site that is not bad enough to be illegal under current law but bad enough that a solid majority of people think it should be stopped.
If it is only government that deals with these things eventually the law will be expanded to cover that site. We'll end up with an ever expanding boundary on what is illegal. A boundary that will probably be very hard to ever shrink. The law is unlikely to handle subtleties well and will catch sites that aren't actually bad but might appear to be so.
If private companies are also looking at what sites they facilitate are doing and dropping those that they think have gone too far it adds fuzziness that allows the system as a whole (private companies plus government) to deal with the bad sites in a way that isn't as blunt and permanent as making the sites illegal.
Government works best as the last level in a multilayered approach to problems.