Live data from Hacker News

Laundry symbols make no sense

uxdesign.cc

201–210 of 237 posts

Re: Laundry symbols make no sense

#201
Just as a reminder: Nothing is context-free. Even, if something may appear self-explanatory to you, there's always convention involved to some degree.

E.g., does this symbol mean do not pack the cleaned cloth in a nylon envelope, or does it mean no dry cleaning? Is this an artificial heat source, or "natural dry"? Or is it the smelly process (bleaching)? Is this a closed chemical or recycling process, or tumbling? Also, the dot system is probably easier to identify and discern and more resistant to wear than the depiction of thermometers (which probably only work relative to each other, having something to compare with).

Moreover, icons like these are not app icons on the home screen: they do not work best, if they (or their constituting elements) are all of even weight. Eye-sight, lighting conditions and ease of identification are primary aspects of this. Something like this should probably work by a primary context identifier, conveyed by the shape, and a secondary qualifier ("specificator") inside that shape with convenient separating whitespace around it.

Re: Laundry symbols make no sense

#203
1. Add a QR code to the labels pointing to a “washingstructions://“ scheme

2. Add said scheme to iOS and Android

3. Scan the QR code

4. iOS or Android show the washing instructions in text/icons/images, of course localized

Re: Laundry symbols make no sense

#204
post #140

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are the benefits of an improvement worth the cost? Do you know how to do your laundry despite not knowing how to read the symbols?

I wash all my laundry on cold and dry on low heat because I'm fat and don't want my clothes to shrink. I have eight of the same black cotton T-shirt. I do not separate my laundry. I do not wear any exotic fabrics, designer clothes, or bright colors, and if I did, I would wash them in the same load of laundry as my other clothes. I am not a benchmark for laundry ability. Maybe there's some easy, incremental improvemen…

>Maybe there's some easy, incremental improvement I could make. But the current symbols do not help me do that.

I'd be curious what the users of the labels think. If they exist.

Re: Laundry symbols make no sense

#206

So many laundry tags have OTT requirements. I have hoodies that claim dry clean only, but of course come out completely fine in the machine. Lots of bras say hand wash only but we've never had any issues with them in the machine either. Generally, we just ignore the labels and put all the clothes in a colour separated wash on the 30c daily eco cycle. If the clothes get damaged - which is rare in a modern non-agitator…

Conversely my t-shirts that claim to be machine washable shrink and need prior knowledge to keep them wearable. The physical world is complex. Interestingly most detergent works great at 30c. Hotter wash temps are for a time before biological enzymes were used as detergent additives.

The detergent we buy works fine at whatever the water temperature is coming out of the cold side of the tap. I don't know that we even need to have the hot water line connected at our house as I don't recall the last time I used any temperature other than "tap cold" (I'm really curious what plain old "cold" does; is there a chiller in there I don't know about?) I mean, it's not like my chemical engineer classmates were sitting on their asses the last 30 years, modern detergent ain't the stuff your Mom used.

And lest one think I'm a dainty flower that doesn't get clothes all that dirty, just last week I was running a trail race, and as I do, caught my foot on a root and went diving downhill straight into a big pile of Pacific Northwest mud. I wasn't sure the mud was going to wash out of my skin, let alone the knee socks and running outfit. One trip through the front loader on cold, and it's like it never happened.

Re: Laundry symbols make no sense

#209

Laundry symbols make no sense... So let's get rid of them! Let's simply make all clothes compatible with a regular wash and tumble dry process. If the clothes use a dye that isn't waterproof, use a different dye. If the fabric is too fragile to withstand spinning, use a stronger fabric. If a material can't withstand the heat of a dryer, use better material. Material science has come so far in the past 100 years that…

Let's simply centrally mandate one standard that everyone adheres to? In what universe is that simple?
Post reply on HN