Earlier quoted context omitted.
Everyone who isn't the sort of "rabid trendchaser techie" that MS is trying to convert more of its users to... fortunately, the majority of slightly-computer-literate people I know are not. They use their computers to create documents, email, browse Internet, and complain about the constant churn of the tech industry. They are constantly irritated by UI changes and other updates that had zero or negative impacts on t…
Ok true, but this is hacker news of course. I would expect most people here to be exactly that sort of "rabid trendchaser techie" :) And of course, the question is how hard is MS going to push Windows 11. They pushed the upgrade from W7 to W10 pretty hard towards end users.
Windows 11 will create heaps of needless trash
201–210 of 343 posts
Re: Windows 11 will create heaps of needless trash
#202To think that all of this Microsoft bullshit could be the propeller for Linux adoption, if only Linux developers had good taste and had developed something worthy of replacing Windows for the average user.
Re: Windows 11 will create heaps of needless trash
#203Earlier quoted context omitted.
Maybe I'm getting old, but it's mental to me that a regular SDD over SATA3 is now regarded as slow , and you need an NVME SSD to run things quickly. I have a gaming PC and really can't tell the difference between games loaded between the two.
Because the games don't take advantage of the higher bandwidth. In fact, they probably don't even take advantage of the SSD, because games are still built so that they work when installed on spinning drives. The advantage of SSDs is the random access time, but if you are streaming continuous data, it's only about triple the speed of an HDD. A NVME PCIe 4.0 SSD can be up to 15 times faster than a SATA SSD. The differe…
Re: Windows 11 will create heaps of needless trash
#204Earlier quoted context omitted.
You think Firefox users are going to be more likely to use an EOL-ed OS?
Perhaps, because win7 is known for being "the last good windows" with some privacy. It may or may not be true, but a lot of people are adamant about not using linux while also trying to maintain privacy, hence they use win7. I imagine such users would probably use a browser like firefox.
Re: Windows 11 will create heaps of needless trash
#205Earlier quoted context omitted.
Maybe I'm getting old, but it's mental to me that a regular SDD over SATA3 is now regarded as slow , and you need an NVME SSD to run things quickly. I have a gaming PC and really can't tell the difference between games loaded between the two.
Because the games don't take advantage of the higher bandwidth. In fact, they probably don't even take advantage of the SSD, because games are still built so that they work when installed on spinning drives. The advantage of SSDs is the random access time, but if you are streaming continuous data, it's only about triple the speed of an HDD. A NVME PCIe 4.0 SSD can be up to 15 times faster than a SATA SSD. The differe…
Re: Windows 11 will create heaps of needless trash
#206Earlier quoted context omitted.
While overall agree, Windows 10 will be supported until 2025. By then any device without TPM 2.0 support would be at least 10 years old, right?
Considering how unexciting new CPUs are nowadays I'd wager that a 10 year old computer in 2025 will still be perfectly usable for basic tasks such as email and web browsing. Something like an 8 year old i7 2700k is still very usable for a lot of home users. It might not be a beast when it comes to crunching numbers, but a big portion of the population would be happy using such a chip if you pair it with at least 8GB…
Re: Windows 11 will create heaps of needless trash
#207Microsoft is late to the party here. This has been core to Apple's business model for years. Here's an example of OS support for the MacBook Air: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MacBook_Air#Supported_macOS_re... The arbitrary cadence of abandonment is amazingly consistent and has no basis in hardware capabilities.
Re: Windows 11 will create heaps of needless trash
#208I hope the public backlash against Microsoft is large enough that they revert there ridiculous system requirements. Requiring TPM 1.2 is sort of reasonable I guess. But TPM 2.0. You've got to be kidding me. Also enabling secure boot is a pain in the ass for users that dual boot, because in Linux, to load a custom compiled kernel module you have to sign it first and do a whole lot of mumbling around to get it working.…
While overall agree, Windows 10 will be supported until 2025. By then any device without TPM 2.0 support would be at least 10 years old, right?