Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's the thinnest iphone ever that hasn't sat flat on a table for years. Touch the screen and it wobbles like a bar table needing some coasters under a leg. Apple purposely designs their cases to be flush with the camera bump, knowing that for most users, the phone will just live in a case. It's kind of ridiculous to build that baked in expectation for more accessory buying directly into your device, but I guess that…
I have an 11 pro without a case on it and just tried replicating what you're describing and I can't do it. It pivots at most 1-2mm laterally to the left when i'm tapping hard on the left side of the screen which is barely noticeable. When I tap normally (a bit softer) or swipe it doesn't even move. I'm no fanboy but i'm amazed that out of all the things you could critique about Apple it would be this one.
AirTag Teardown Part One: Yeah, This Tracks
201–207 of 207 posts
Re: AirTag Teardown Part One: Yeah, This Tracks
#202I wonder what the internal discussion at Apple was about whether or not to include a loophole in the product. The fact that fixit has gone out and shown how you can add a loophole rather than wasting $13 on an accessory is a bit of a facepalm moment.
Re: AirTag Teardown Part One: Yeah, This Tracks
#203What exactly is 'UWB functionality'? Are they using UWB for RF localization? I assume you would need multiple beacons for that? Are they using the phone as a single beacon? Wouldn't this just give you a radius rather than a location?
Yeah maybe. But from what I've heard the product can do, it'll guide you with a heading pointing towards where the product is. It may be that the iPhone has some sort of dual antenna functionality where the difference in time between signals being recieved can be used to find the direction.
Above is the FiRa Consortium's literature. NXP makes a similar chip to Apple's "U1" UWB chip -- however, sigh, the standards are NOT compatible. Yes, they are both UWB and use the FCC rules for UWB RF requirements (frequencies, power, etc) -- but for reasons I do not understand, they are different elsewhere (Protocols? I don't know).
Re: AirTag Teardown Part One: Yeah, This Tracks
#204Earlier quoted context omitted.
Fair enough I suppose, but it still seems a bit excessive. For a first-party example, you could maybe get approx. 30 keychains or a Macbook Air.
Are 1st-party accessories ever the cheapest option, for any brand?
I'd also argue that it's only an accessory if the product either came with it or is complete without it. The iPad has $100 cases and so on, but I've never really felt the need for one It also had a $30 charger, but it came with one. An extra would be accessory, and without it the product wouldn't really work.
Re: AirTag Teardown Part One: Yeah, This Tracks
#205Re: AirTag Teardown Part One: Yeah, This Tracks
#206> All three trackers open up with finger power—no other tools required! That said, the AirTag is by far the most difficult, I'm a little bit uncomfortable about this, because it gives access to a coin cell battery. People under-estimate how dangerous batteries can be. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6134a1.htm > From 1997 to 2010, an estimated 40,400 children aged <13 years were treated in hospital emerge…
Re: AirTag Teardown Part One: Yeah, This Tracks
#207Earlier quoted context omitted.
What are you talking about? It's not free, there is a deductible. And it's not anytime you want. It's a maximum of 2 incidences per year. So you pay $200 a year plus $30 for cracking your screen. Or $150 for loss or theft. I'm guessing you could get a third party screen repair for less than $230.
Oh, Apple stores will waive the deductible if you ask. They don't even try to charge it if your device was originally sold in the EU. I've replaced two iphones in the past month, didn't pay a deductible for either. If you break your phone more than twice a year, a regular phone case probably isn't going to cut it. >I'm guessing you could get a third party screen repair for less than $230. Yes, but not 4 third party s…