Earlier quoted context omitted.
I might care more once laws start protecting children from those in power more than used by those in power as a ploy to dismantle privacy from ordinary people.
There should be no upper level you start caring about child protection - every level counts, whether it is a hosting company or others high up
The link between hosting child porn and child protection is much more subject to argument. I'd suggest it is banned because enough people suspect the link to be there, not because of any certainty.
It is unfortunately common for terrible ideas to be shepherded in under the pretence of thinking about the children. There needs to be debate about costs and benefits of this stuff beyond the crystal clear parts. It isn't reasonable to just assume someone doesn't care about protecting children just because they're willing to host anything. Although in this case they are being rather disrespectful to the people who use the form and that doesn't sit well with me.