Earlier quoted context omitted.
Please don't use words that have a real medical meaning in such an inaccurate and casual way. Calling things addictive has real consequences in terms of legislators taking these confused public sentiments as fact and then trying to use force against the groups that are "addicted". Addiction has never been proven in this context. Addiction is a a real, serious problem with drugs that effect the brains reward system (o…
If it was just opioids or ampthetamines, alcohol or nocotine wouldn't be addictive, would it? Please don't use incomplete or irrelevant factoids when you contradict. But prediction of reward might very well be a concise description of the drive behind social media use.
Obviously it's not. I gave examples of two drugs and their direct mechanisms of action.
>But prediction of reward might very well be a concise description of the drive behind social media use.
No, that's a description of a living mammal brain. Addiction is when that system is hijacked directly, not when it is doing it's normal thing in response to stimuli.