Live data from Hacker News

ByteDance investors value TikTok at $50B in takeover bid

reuters.com

201–204 of 204 posts

Re: ByteDance investors value TikTok at $50B in takeover bid

#201
post #75

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>The stable community is driven in part by their algorithms, which replace Instagram and Facebook's idea of a feed of those you follow. It gives more power to TikTok, in that you won't notice if some members of the community leave, and they can continue showing you content you'll enjoy from millions of other users. The endurance of Facebook, Instagram, Youtube and Twitter is the precisely because of the connect/subsc…

> Algorithmic content from random creators is not a model for creating an enduring user base. Users will eventually get desensitised to it and leave. There's a limit to how many memes you can consume. Another thing about these users in this specific demographic always eventually do is they just grow out of it and leave for something else. Or perhaps what was 'hot' in 2020 is now 'not' in 2021. They'll just flock to t…

If the demographic is the 15-25 age range, they will leave as soon as they feel that their aunt and her dog has signed up, therefore making it "not cool" by definition

Re: ByteDance investors value TikTok at $50B in takeover bid

#202
post #197

Earlier quoted context omitted.

https://www.privateinternetaccess.com/blog/tiktok-seems-to-b...

https://www.theverge.com/2020/7/3/21312821/linkedin-app-ios-... This does not seem specific to tiktok at all. Would you jump in on discussions on LinkedIn and claim "Not surprised, given how sketchy LinkedIn is?"

There's not only clipboard issues, this Reddit user did some digging and found some interesting things.

https://old.reddit.com/r/videos/comments/fxgi06/not_new_news...

Re: ByteDance investors value TikTok at $50B in takeover bid

#203

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ofcourse Platform companies are overvalued. There is no real tech here just user content they are trying to monetize. Infact I would go ahead and say real tech was under valued look at Sun Microsystems, A company that Developed its own Processor (Sparc) , Its own OS (Solaris) , Its own Database (Mysql) , Its own VM (Virtual Box) , Its own Language and Development Platform (Java), Its own Development IDE (Netbeans) ev…

> And yet the company was sold at 1 Billion USD, which seemed like short change. That was 2009 though, was 1B USD small compared to the average corporate acquisitions at the time? Instagram was also sold for 1B if I recall correctly.

Exactly my point Instagram is not technology, it is a platform for user content. Sun was a technology company with some real deep tech.
Post reply on HN