Earlier quoted context omitted.
Can't you just store your repositories in the ext4 partition then?
I need them available to Windows tools, like Visual Studio and Unity.
Windows Subsystem for Linux 2 Moving into General Availability
201–210 of 420 posts
Re: Windows Subsystem for Linux 2 Moving into General Availability
#202Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sound and bluetooth , like , works now? That wasn't my experience back then. Both of them were entire stacks of spaghetti.
This seems like comment from early 2000s. I don't remember last time I head problems with BT or sound, and I went through dozen of installations in last 3 years (for me and others). I had to give up on Nvidia drivers but Intel graphics serves me great.
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=204875 2015 November
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=206032 2015 December
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=210685 2016 March.
And these were times when I needed community help, most of the time I could get it working by pairing again or some such nonsense. It never worked reliably, in general.
Note I switched to Windows as my daily driver in 2018 January.
It seems sound is still a gigantic mess of PulseAudio and ALSA https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/PulseAudio
Re: Windows Subsystem for Linux 2 Moving into General Availability
#203Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Presumably, this also means you have to have Hyper-V enabled, crippling all other VM software How does hyper-V cripple other VM software? I just had to enable it to use a prebuilt VM I need, now I’m a little worried
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/wsl/wsl2-faq https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/wsl/wsl2-ux-changes
I don't really grok this, does this mean Hyper-V will be available on Windows 10 Home? That's the only reason I am considering buying a pro license.
Re: Windows Subsystem for Linux 2 Moving into General Availability
#204Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sound and bluetooth , like , works now? That wasn't my experience back then. Both of them were entire stacks of spaghetti.
This seems like comment from early 2000s. I don't remember last time I head problems with BT or sound, and I went through dozen of installations in last 3 years (for me and others). I had to give up on Nvidia drivers but Intel graphics serves me great.
Bluetooth has never worked.
Re: Windows Subsystem for Linux 2 Moving into General Availability
#205I am giving up. WSL1 was a great invention but Microsoft gave up on it, either because of the filesystem performance problems or because of the debuggers. https://github.com/microsoft/WSL/issues/2028 (lldb, rr, delve all affected). This looks like a dreaded case of the first 90% is easy, it's the second 90% that is hard. Imagine implementing a translator for a vast majority of Linux syscalls just to find certain flav…
Re: Windows Subsystem for Linux 2 Moving into General Availability
#206Earlier quoted context omitted.
I agree wholeheartedly. I know it was probably a fool’s errand especially in a world where Docker for Windows was doing the same thing WSL2 does but worse, but WSL1’s design just satisfied me in a way that Hyper-V will not. Presumably, this also means you have to have Hyper-V enabled, crippling all other VM software. Hope the integration is impressive at least, to hopefully make up for it. I admittedly don’t run Wind…
Stop blaming Hyper-V for "crippling other VM software". You ever tried to run VBox and KVM together? It's a limitation of the processor's virtualization extension.
Although, I don’t know if both kinds of VMs can run in parallel. I recall at least doing so with VMWare in the past.
The thing is, when enabling Hyper-V on Windows, you can’t do anything without fully rebooting. On Linux I know for a fact you do not need to reboot to switch between VMs.
Re: Windows Subsystem for Linux 2 Moving into General Availability
#207In genuine amazement at a lot of the comments here - why not just dual boot Linux instead of using it in a VM? Productivity on a Linux machine can be so far ahead of Windows, especially if you've got a terminal-based workflow an maybe a tiling WM
Re: Windows Subsystem for Linux 2 Moving into General Availability
#208In genuine amazement at a lot of the comments here - why not just dual boot Linux instead of using it in a VM? Productivity on a Linux machine can be so far ahead of Windows, especially if you've got a terminal-based workflow an maybe a tiling WM
This way, it feels like I'm on Linux the whole time with a Windows themed desktop, great support for games and no hardware issues. This isn't about ideological purity for me. If everything works, I'm happy.
Re: Windows Subsystem for Linux 2 Moving into General Availability
#209Earlier quoted context omitted.
Stop blaming Hyper-V for "crippling other VM software". You ever tried to run VBox and KVM together? It's a limitation of the processor's virtualization extension.
That's false The above commenter linked to a far more thorough explanation https://superuser.com/questions/1208850/why-cant-virtualbox-...
no. not together. Still a limitation of the virtualization extensions.
Re: Windows Subsystem for Linux 2 Moving into General Availability
#210In WSL1, running "wsl git status" on a moderately sized repo on an NTFS (Windows side) drive or SMB file share is nearly instantaneous. In WSL2, running the same command takes over 30 seconds. WSL2 is a massive hit to the seemless experience between the two operating systems with filesystem performance from Linux to Windows files orders of magnitude worse. Yes, unzipping tarballs or manipulating and stat syscalls are…