Live data from Hacker News

Verizon says to shed 10,400 jobs by mid next year

reuters.com

201–210 of 215 posts

Re: Verizon says to shed 10,400 jobs by mid next year

#201

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Stock buybacks done with these tax cuts, enriching shareholders, does little to stoke economic demand." Stock buybacks don't 'enrich' anyone. Money that is owned by investors goes from 'inside the company' to 'outside' and it 's superficially a net neutral transaction. What those buy backs do do however is free up capital to be used in more intelligent ways than can be used by the single entity, in this case Verizon…

I think the trade war with China was inevitable. Not to say the U.S. doesn't or hasn't used state resources to bolster business, China does it to an extent that no other country has or could. Given the U.S. labor market and cost of said labor by comparison, it's about the only way to even attempt preserving that pool. Yes it will make things more expensive, it will probably also cycle a faster upswing in demands for…

The US has been in a 'trade war' with China since the 1980s.

But it's been a 'frog in warming to boiling water' type scenario.

By that I mean - the protectionism, corruption, IP theft etc. has been going on forever - it's just that we didn't care.

Actually - we didn't mind - because a backwards mess of a poor economy might want to do 'whatever it takes' to move forward.

Everyone (well most) was very happy to see China come out of the doldrums. It's better for everyone, generally.

But now that they are reaching for advanced economy status ... the 'issues' become ever more apparent.

I don't like Trump one bit, I find him kind of nauseating in his demeanor - and - I'm not even sure his manner of approach to the 'war' is right.

BUT - 100% of politicians are otherwise incapable of standing up to China. Ironically, it just mike take a loose-cannon douche-bag to do it.

'The West' speaks with 1000 voices: CEOs, NGO leaders, politicians, bureaucrats, federal/state, different countries within federal entities (i.e. EU), heads of Universities, research establishments.

China speaks with 'one voice' and they have a plan, which can actually be carried out.

So if anyone tries to stand up to them, China can scare that 'little individual' with all sorts of things, and by 'little individual' I even mean heads of state.

But ironically, in totality, Western powers do have the upper hand, both because of the direction of trade, but also because of the size of economies, sophistication, all sorts of other reasons.

Example: Trudeau in Canada will mollify Chinese and would be afraid to do anything because China could threaten to not buy Canadian commodities. But here's the thing: they are commodities! So if China stops buying hardwood from B.C. and starts buying it from elsewhere, then as prices receded in Canada and prices increase 'elsewhere' - other buyers come to B.C. for hardwood.

China buying a commodity is like them scooping water out of a river -> it doesn't matter who buys what, the aggregate demand is the same.

But the interim calamity and fear from China walking away will push Canadian CEO's to make Trudeau cede whatever to China.

As an example.

NPR just had an interview with the Robert Lighthizer [1] who talks about the fact China has been saying they'll 'do things' on IP for over 20 years but they've done nothing really. These talks are the first time basically ever that the US is speaking with credibility in terms of actual response/retaliation.

I suggest the Chinese are just waiting for Trump to be out of office, or to give him something political to show for it, and then going back to normal. I would be ideal if the US political org. got together with the EU, Japan, S. Korea, India and Australia ... and made a coordinated, long term effort on these issues. It would actually be better for everyone - even the Chinese, in the long term.

[1] https://www.npr.org/2018/12/07/674730823/u-s-trade-represent...

Re: Verizon says to shed 10,400 jobs by mid next year

#202
post #185
post #180

Earlier quoted context omitted.

All of your responses are blatantly telling the person you're responding to what they were thinking instead of considering that perhaps there are multiple ways to interpret things. You told padseeker that they were insinuating something when at best you could guess that they were insinuating something. If you're actually interested in discussing things instead of telling people what they believe or what their intent…

It's overwhelmingly clear what he was insinuating. He's made no attempt to prove otherwise in his response to me or others.

I'll make it clearer for you; "In spite of" NOT THE SAME AS "Because of"

My comment is clearly saying "IN SPITE OF". I think most people who are reading with intellectual honesty would recognize that.

The people who would interpret it as "BECAUSE OF" before this clarification might have a certain oppositional viewpoint.

And the only people who would interpret it as "BECAUSE OF" after this clarification don't actually care about having a debate, but would rather call me a liar because it feels better than engaging.

I literally cannot dumb it down any more than this.

Re: Verizon says to shed 10,400 jobs by mid next year

#203
The cuts are voluntary, and people are getting 1 years salary out of it. I suggest a lot of people are more than happy to take it in a good job market.

That people are making the choice - and many don't seem to mind doing it, makes this quite a different thing than a regular layoff.

Apparently churn has been high, and people leaving their jobs voluntarily is in some ways a good sign for the economy. They certainly don't do that when times are bad.

Re: Verizon says to shed 10,400 jobs by mid next year

#204
post #133

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> At no point was that ever insinuated Are you serious man? Why be so dishonest? It's clear as day that that's what you were insinuating. Why lie like this?

The point is so simple and straight forward I question your ability to carry on this conversation. It is bloody obvious what I'm trying to say. The idea is that we have a problem, a stagnating economy, lack of jobs and stagnating wages. The prescribed solution to this problem was tax cuts. So if you still having large scale layoffs then it appears that maybe the SOLUTION is not quite solving the PROBLEM. Instead I ne…

You've broken the site guidelines badly in this thread. Would you please stop doing this flamewar and not do any more flamewars on HN? Regardless of how strongly you feel about a topic.

Copying and pasting flamewar comments is a particularly destructive flavor of arson.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Re: Verizon says to shed 10,400 jobs by mid next year

#205
post #17

Putting the tax cuts to work, I see... Edit: I must have already triggered some right-wing snowflakes

Please don't post flamebait on HN, and please don't use it for repetitive political battle. This is a site for intellectual curiosity, and those things don't go together.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Re: Verizon says to shed 10,400 jobs by mid next year

#206

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Just don’t accept that job if they say no. Look for a new job if your current one doesn’t offer this.

Good luck with that unless you're a special snowflake....

It’s just a basic part of average-case negotiations for most software jobs at a wide range of companies.

People like you, who don’t negotiate or turn down offers when they don’t include severance, unfortunately end up not getting benefits they could otherwise routinely get by negotiating and being willing to say no.

Re: Verizon says to shed 10,400 jobs by mid next year

#207
post #10

I read on the Layoff they had about 11.4k applicants, and 90% of them were accepted. Looks like the first wave is out starting Dec 28th. With such a large cut it would be weird to be rejected, I would feel an awkward mix of jealousy and loss to go back to work afterwards.

With those kind of hiring numbers and lay offs, it seems to me that they had senior employees train younger, less expensive (in salary and medical cost) replacements and then lay off the older, more expensive workers. Less vacation time, less pay, less family headache, less everything. It's a win/win for Verizon. It's been done time and time again. I'm not sure why everyone's arguing Repubs and Dems above, other than…

Oracle does this almost 3x per year.

It took senior people making 90-120 base and laid them off to employ (me and others) at 47-60k base salary in Massachusetts.

Then after 3 years, they laid us college kids off to employ even lower paid fresh graduates in Austin and San Antonio, because Texas cut them an even better deal than MA did I believe.

Re: Verizon says to shed 10,400 jobs by mid next year

#208

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Good luck with that unless you're a special snowflake....

It’s just a basic part of average-case negotiations for most software jobs at a wide range of companies. People like you, who don’t negotiate or turn down offers when they don’t include severance, unfortunately end up not getting benefits they could otherwise routinely get by negotiating and being willing to say no.

As a developer/architect in a major metropolitan city, why would I worry about getting laid off? In 20 years its never taken me more than three weeks to get another job - always paying more. My record was walking off a bad contract at lunch Monday with not even an application submitted somewhere, meeting a recruiter and having an offer at what was then a Fortune 10 company on Thursday. The only time I got laid off was when the company went under - meaning any promise of “severance” would have been moot. Even then I was laid off on Friday and scooped up by one of the company's clients and started working the next Monday.

Yes I was around for both the dotcom bust and the 2008 recession. Even then major corporations were hiring.

There is a much higher chance that I’m going to leave a company than a company is going to leave me. I’m going to negotiate pay, PTO, and even a title that looks good on my resume.

Re: Verizon says to shed 10,400 jobs by mid next year

#209
post #11

So.. they finished laying the groundwork for their 5g network, and now they won’t need 7% of their workforce until 6g starts to go in 6-10 years?

Every ISP in the world is shedding employees. Every generation the network gets more digitized, more virtualised and you simply need less people to maintain and update it.

Re: Verizon says to shed 10,400 jobs by mid next year

#210

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It’s just a basic part of average-case negotiations for most software jobs at a wide range of companies. People like you, who don’t negotiate or turn down offers when they don’t include severance, unfortunately end up not getting benefits they could otherwise routinely get by negotiating and being willing to say no.

As a developer/architect in a major metropolitan city, why would I worry about getting laid off? In 20 years its never taken me more than three weeks to get another job - always paying more. My record was walking off a bad contract at lunch Monday with not even an application submitted somewhere, meeting a recruiter and having an offer at what was then a Fortune 10 company on Thursday. The only time I got laid off wa…

I went through a layoff once where my whole company department (about 30 people, mostly machine learning engineers with PhDs) was laid off in a big restructuring. We were all located in a major US city.

Several of my colleagues (one with two young children and a brand new mortgage) needed well over 6 months to find their next job. Few places were hiring for their skill area and _many_ companies passed on them just because having a resume gap from the layoff is an instant HR filter.

On top of this, paying for your own insurance even with COBRA is prohibitively expensive, like $600/month for an individual, upwards of $1500 for a family.

Some other teammates affected by that layoff faced really severe ageism during months of interviews before finding a job.

In other words, your comment is hopelessly myopic and I hope you never experience the kind of grim unemployment that many people face, even developers in job-heavy cities, because you don’t seem equipped to survive it.

Post reply on HN