Earlier quoted context omitted.
Haha, I had assumed someone would mention that. But most Lisps are pretty rough-and-ready about these sorts of things. IIRC, Scheme requires the body of the lambda to be a single expression, doesn't it? And then you just cheat your way out of it with (begin ...).
> IIRC, Scheme requires the body of the lambda to be a single expression, doesn't it? No, it doesn't require it.
It used to, though. From the original Scheme paper: Note that in SCHEME, unlike MacLISP, the body of a LAMBDA expression is not an implicit PROGN.