Earlier quoted context omitted.
The majority never picks the best and markets do not optimize as much as some people think. Whether it's movies, arts, books, music, politicians, keyboards or programming languages, the most popular choices are practically never the best ones. Which is probably why a technocracy in which every voter must pass a fact-based proficiency test before being allowed to vote might trump democracy. Not sure, just wanted to ch…
Who gets to determine which facts? Why would that group not use that to their advantage, instead of to the benefit of everyone? > The majority never picks the best and markets do not optimize as much as some people think. Whether it's movies, arts, books, music, politicians, keyboards or programming languages, the most popular choices are practically never the best ones. The question is not whether the market picks t…
Also, the facts can be discussed openly and if there was a problem with some of them, there could be a system of revoking or modifying the set of questions similar to the recounting of ballots.
For the committee of experts, that was your idea, I never suggested that, because it obviously makes no sense.