New Court Evidence Reveals Hollywood’s Plan to Smear Google
21–30 of 135 posts
Re: New Court Evidence Reveals Hollywood’s Plan to Smear Google
#22Re: New Court Evidence Reveals Hollywood’s Plan to Smear Google
#23Re: New Court Evidence Reveals Hollywood’s Plan to Smear Google
#24Can you really smear a company who's reputation is already beyond repair?
Re: New Court Evidence Reveals Hollywood’s Plan to Smear Google
#25Re: New Court Evidence Reveals Hollywood’s Plan to Smear Google
#26Re: New Court Evidence Reveals Hollywood’s Plan to Smear Google
#27Re: New Court Evidence Reveals Hollywood’s Plan to Smear Google
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
That would be lovely, however that probably won't happen. Seeing google might get sued for that.
Why? They are a private company, they can do whatever they want on their site (also known as the iOS censorship apologist argument)
However, Google already attempts to reward original content so if they could do it algorithmically to everyone (hence not disrupting the competitive marketplace) I think they'd be able to claim "oops."
Re: New Court Evidence Reveals Hollywood’s Plan to Smear Google
#29Earlier quoted context omitted.
How so?
Because the MPAA is often the larger entity in court, and with leverage (copyright law). They have a long, litigious history from DMCA takedowns & expansion to SOPA. They don't mind suing individuals, wholesale [1]. In this particular case it's pretty clear the MPAA and the AG were both out of bounds. Why would the AG, the top lawyer for the state government (and supposedly for the people), need to help the MPAA with…
Is this not fraudulent?
Re: New Court Evidence Reveals Hollywood’s Plan to Smear Google
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why? They are a private company, they can do whatever they want on their site (also known as the iOS censorship apologist argument)
I think it would be possibly anti-competitive. However, Google already attempts to reward original content so if they could do it algorithmically to everyone (hence not disrupting the competitive marketplace) I think they'd be able to claim "oops."