Live data from Hacker News

Content Is King (1996)

web.archive.org

21–30 of 30 posts

Re: Content Is King (1996)

#21

Which was more prescient, this or "Content is Not King"? http://firstmonday.org/article/view/833/742 In many ways, it seems like Microsoft's late-90's obsession with content didn't really pan out. Sure, MSNBC is still around but sidewalk.com long since evaporated. It doesn't seem like MSFT really became a profitable media company. But look at how many multi-billion dollar "unicorns" are messaging companies.

> But look at how many multi-billion dollar "unicorns" are messaging companies.

Talking about current valuations of relatively young companies is odd when comparing to Microsoft's history. The scale of things means that what works for one doesn't necessarily work for the other.

Re: Content Is King (1996)

#22
post #20
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> "Computers are great because when you're working with them you get immediate results that let you know if your program works. It's feedback you don't get from many other things." No, you get that feedback from playing music and singing.

I played music badly for years, never noticed it.

Did you enjoy it? The same thing can be applied to programming.

Re: Content Is King (1996)

#23
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I soaked that book up as a 15 year old when it was released. I remember proudly writing a report on it. In retrospect, The Road Ahead probably had a more profound effect on me than I realized at the time. There's a great quote from the book which sums up why I took hold to computers and software more than many of the other creative and engineering related endeavors I had at the time: "Computers are great because when…

> "Computers are great because when you're working with them you get immediate results that let you know if your program works. It's feedback you don't get from many other things." No, you get that feedback from playing music and singing.

No what? He says "many" other things, not "any other things".

Re: Content Is King (1996)

#24
post #19

For video, meaning shows and movies, content is king. For music and writing, distribution is king.

Why is distribution king? What is special about music and writing that makes it so that people wont seek out quality content?

lower barrier to entry. easier to get to acceptable quality.

Re: Content Is King (1996)

#25

Anyone who finds this interesting should track down a copy of The Road Ahead ( http://www.amazon.com/Road-Ahead-Bill-Gates/dp/9573231670/ ), the book Gates published at around the same time as this appeared. It's an interesting look at his thinking just when he was beginning to realize (very nearly too late!) that the Internet was going to be a Very Big Deal.

I soaked that book up as a 15 year old when it was released. I remember proudly writing a report on it. In retrospect, The Road Ahead probably had a more profound effect on me than I realized at the time. There's a great quote from the book which sums up why I took hold to computers and software more than many of the other creative and engineering related endeavors I had at the time: "Computers are great because when…

Lisp fan?

Re: Content Is King (1996)

#27
post #13

As connections to the Internet get faster, the annoyance of waiting for an advertisement to load will diminish and then disappear. But that's a few years off. Still is. And will always be. The annoyance of ads will always expand to fill any improvements in throughput achieved by technology.

If only someone invented a way to block ads from loading :) Seriously though, why did it take so long for adblocker to be invented?

Long? There's been ad-blocking proxies available for a long time. Eg: http://www.squidguard.org/history.html

I remember setting up some kind of http-proxy with local cache an ad filters in the late 90s, early 00s -- possibly squid with a plugin -- probably on Slackware. Persistent local cache of static resources helped a lot with loading sites (which doesn't really make any sense, considering browsers already had a local cache). Ad-blocking was simple -- just replacing banner.gif-s with a blank gif image or something along those lines. But it worked, and preserved the layout of the page.

Re: Content Is King (1996)

#28
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> "Computers are great because when you're working with them you get immediate results that let you know if your program works. It's feedback you don't get from many other things." No, you get that feedback from playing music and singing.

No what? He says "many" other things, not "any other things".

Cooking, dancing, playing with Legos, etc.

Re: Content Is King (1996)

#29

We spend far more time consuming content generated by our friends and family then we do consuming content created by media companies. I don't think he could conceive that a company like Facebook could control the means of distribution by providing something that people want more the professional media.

"We spend far more time consuming content generated by our friends and family then we do consuming content created by media companies."

I think this is generally true, but less true today than it may have been a few years ago.

What percentage of interactions on social networks involve sharing or referencing preexisting content of some sort? Movie trailers, articles, songs, Buzzfeed lists, surveys, memes, and so forth? Many of these forms of content have been created by one type of media company or another.

Re: Content Is King (1996)

#30
post #13

As connections to the Internet get faster, the annoyance of waiting for an advertisement to load will diminish and then disappear. But that's a few years off. Still is. And will always be. The annoyance of ads will always expand to fill any improvements in throughput achieved by technology.

If only someone invented a way to block ads from loading :) Seriously though, why did it take so long for adblocker to be invented?

Junkbuster, squid, and privoxy have been around for quite a while.
Post reply on HN