This website does the worst job explaining what it's even here for. I have to spend ten minutes reading obfuscated to text to understand that the font shows different glyphs when I type a "dangerous" word? Why do this in a font? Why don't you build a spellcheck dictionary and misuse that technology instead of this one that's in front of me all day?
Project Seen
21–24 of 24 posts
Re: Project Seen
#22This website does the worst job explaining what it's even here for. I have to spend ten minutes reading obfuscated to text to understand that the font shows different glyphs when I type a "dangerous" word? Why do this in a font? Why don't you build a spellcheck dictionary and misuse that technology instead of this one that's in front of me all day?
It was not that bad, sometimes I don't like information presented in A, B, C format and like to figure things out. I enjoyed it.
Re: Project Seen
#23It would be nice if a few of the people upvoting this came into the comments section to explain what they liked about it. I personally find absolutely no value.
Re: Project Seen
#24> claims to protect against dangerous words
> fails to censor the name of that D&D-playing traitor Edward Snowden
0/10