A venture capital firm says it invests in people “pre-idea, pre-team”
21–30 of 52 posts
Re: A venture capital firm says it invests in people “pre-idea, pre-team”
#22I'm at month 3 of the EF process. Happy to answer any questions :-)
Re: A venture capital firm says it invests in people “pre-idea, pre-team”
#23> 10% of applicants are accepted after multiple rounds of interviews and even a logics and computing test. It's interesting to note that they are trying to hire entrepreneurs the same way Google was trying to hire programmers 10 years ago.
Re: A venture capital firm says it invests in people “pre-idea, pre-team”
#24Re: A venture capital firm says it invests in people “pre-idea, pre-team”
#25Earlier quoted context omitted.
Doesn't YC give 120K for 7%? An incubator/accelerator that isn't as good as YC (and therefore has less to offer) should have a better deal than that to make up for the difference. Given YC as a baseline, an investment of 10K GBP == 15488 USD should be taking less than 0.9% of the company.
>An incubator/accelerator that isn't as good as YC should have a better deal than that to make up for the difference Only from the perspective of someone being recruited by both YC and the alternative. If YC isn't an option (as it isn't for most people), then it doesn't much matter whether or not YC is offering a better deal to someone else.
Re: A venture capital firm says it invests in people “pre-idea, pre-team”
#26Our universities don't exhibit anywhere near the same 'entrepreneurial culture' vs the US equivalents (although this is slowly improving - thankfully). We also don't have the big tech companies (google/fb etc) with the means to compete with banks/hedge-funds for the highest quality engineers/PMs. In the US, these institutions serve as natural breeding grounds for startups. Without these environments, it becomes much more difficult to find like-minded people to develop ideas and raises the time/cost associated with doing so.
I joined EF on the current cohort for this reason and have been surprised (to the upside) with my fellow cohort members. They have managed to recruit some exceptionally talented and motivated people who would be difficult to find otherwise. Also, apart from the cash investment (which just serves to pay your living costs), they have a great network of industry contacts, alumni and investors.
The jury is out on whether the EF model will succeed in producing valuable companies. However, given the level of technical talent it is attracting, they are definitely solving a real problem and I believe it will outperform the YC-style accelerators who have been struggling in Europe. Hopefully they will open the investment fund up to alumni in the near future :)
Message me if you have any questions - would be happy to answer.
Re: A venture capital firm says it invests in people “pre-idea, pre-team”
#27I'm at month 3 of the EF process. Happy to answer any questions :-)
Assuming this was true for you? do you have an idea & team now? How long were you funded/hired without these two in place? Theoretically how long can one last in the program if you dont find these 2?
How long have you been burning their cash, have you raised other funds? You could be considered an even Riskier (debatable) investment than the alternate of an actual startup with an MVP actively looking for funding, so does their percentage reflect that? Did you pay an entrance fee as well?
Thanks!
Re: A venture capital firm says it invests in people “pre-idea, pre-team”
#28Unfeasible and uninvestable, but good if you want to get an EU grant I guess. Who is even the target market? Meanwhile just follow all russian, ukrainian and western media sources and compare them.
Re: A venture capital firm says it invests in people “pre-idea, pre-team”
#29£10k for an 8% equity stake, how does this compare to other funding in London? The article mentions the "Founder Institute" provides £1k for 3.5%.
Re: A venture capital firm says it invests in people “pre-idea, pre-team”
#30EF solves a real problem in the UK. Our universities don't exhibit anywhere near the same 'entrepreneurial culture' vs the US equivalents (although this is slowly improving - thankfully). We also don't have the big tech companies (google/fb etc) with the means to compete with banks/hedge-funds for the highest quality engineers/PMs. In the US, these institutions serve as natural breeding grounds for startups. Without…
I have a question. Who exactly will decide what the product would be?Is this something those people would decide among themselves, or the EF would put them on a particular project idea they think is suitable for that team?