Live data from Hacker News

The Agency: An army of well-paid “trolls” in St. Petersburg

nytimes.com

21–30 of 97 posts

Re: The Agency: An army of well-paid “trolls” in St. Petersburg

#21
This sort of thing has happened recently on HN, where trolls derailed the conversation so badly that it was flagged into oblivion. (dang brought it back to life after an email appeal).

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9570202

What's the right way for a community to permit free and welcoming discourse and simultaneously blunt the ability of malicious actors intent on spreading disinformation? It's a hard problem.

Re: The Agency: An army of well-paid “trolls” in St. Petersburg

#22
Astroturf happens everywhere... news at 11... it's easy to laugh at the paid Russians and their broken English but it wasn't too long ago you had stories of British intelligence rigging online polls and the US government contracting out software to manage mass amounts of social media personas to target jihadists(and I'm sure the same tactics are being used against Russia too).

Re: The Agency: An army of well-paid “trolls” in St. Petersburg

#23
post #7

I am sure this is not only happening in Russia.

Some PR strategies are similar. A company hold an annual conference several weeks ago. The company was under represented in the HN user base. What was eye opening was that many new users joined HN in a short timeframe to write very pro-company comments - it looked like an concerted effort to polish the company reputation. Another example is related to a recent video game release. The marketing was in a gray area almost a fraud and the launch was like a debacle, though the PR managed to get away with it with a black eye.

Re: The Agency: An army of well-paid “trolls” in St. Petersburg

#24

Astroturf happens everywhere... news at 11... it's easy to laugh at the paid Russians and their broken English but it wasn't too long ago you had stories of British intelligence rigging online polls and the US government contracting out software to manage mass amounts of social media personas to target jihadists(and I'm sure the same tactics are being used against Russia too).

The question for me is how to counteract this kind of trolling. If someone is saying something stupid, it's easy as an individual to ignore it ignoring the time wasted reading it, but it's genuinely deadly for communities.

I think some kind of web of trust, except this time for comments or social media artifacts, is probably the way to go.

Re: The Agency: An army of well-paid “trolls” in St. Petersburg

#25
post #3

Poorly titled and therefore hard to share on Hacker News, but lengthy and worth reading investigative reporting into a bizarre 'Internet Research Agency' that mainly produces pro-Putin propaganda, in both English and Russian. I'm surprised, frankly, that they don't have better English-language proficiency.

> that mainly produces pro-Putin propaganda, in both English and Russian. And also seems to be testing disinformation campaigns in the US, such as spreading panic about (fake) disasters.

I feel like this (testing disinformation campaigns within the US) wasn't addressed fully and is the most significant aspect of the "trolling" operations. Not many care if Russians are spreading lies to Russians about Putin, but attempting to cause panic in the US by faking a disaster is the most dangerous aspect of this practice.

Re: The Agency: An army of well-paid “trolls” in St. Petersburg

#26
My dad claims that the level of brainwashing in Russia far far exceeds that of the Soviet regime, and the propaganda is by far worse (and worse than WWII Germany he says).

Of course statements like that evoke Godwin's law and a hard to swallow. However, my dad grew up in Soviet Russia and trained troops on the use of artillery equipment during the Soviet Afghanistan conflict. He's been around the block and has seen firsthand the Soviet propaganda in multiple Soviet republics.

If you think about the insidiousness of troll-style, FUD propaganda, it's way way more psychologically insidious than the overt Soviet propaganda. You can't cut off access to facts and appear "fair"--instead you make people question the truth.

Russia just raised a whole young generation that's a socially-backwards by a generation. Homophobic, racist, blame-the-west feelings are rampant.

During the early days of the Ukranian conflict, I was surprised to hear a close relative in Russia tell me how she has seen videos on Youtube of "blacks from Africa" killing innocent Russian youths ("gouging their eyes out" she said) in Eastern Ukraine.

This shit is real.

Re: The Agency: An army of well-paid “trolls” in St. Petersburg

#27

My dad claims that the level of brainwashing in Russia far far exceeds that of the Soviet regime, and the propaganda is by far worse (and worse than WWII Germany he says). Of course statements like that evoke Godwin's law and a hard to swallow. However, my dad grew up in Soviet Russia and trained troops on the use of artillery equipment during the Soviet Afghanistan conflict. He's been around the block and has seen f…

The rest of the world has also gotten much better at propaganda. Listing to older broadcasts can almost seem laughable in comparison.

EX: Reefer madness vs. modern anti-smoking campaigns. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reefer_Madness http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/06/24/cdc-smo...

I find it deeply concerning how easily a modern state can alter how its population thinks. Outright lies are a lot easier to counter than selective truths.

Re: The Agency: An army of well-paid “trolls” in St. Petersburg

#29
post #21

This sort of thing has happened recently on HN, where trolls derailed the conversation so badly that it was flagged into oblivion. (dang brought it back to life after an email appeal). https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9570202 What's the right way for a community to permit free and welcoming discourse and simultaneously blunt the ability of malicious actors intent on spreading disinformation? It's a hard problem.

You are certain that trolls derailed the conversation?

It could just as well be one person stating his opinions. His opinions are controversal, and therefore they generate lots of responses (derailing) and he is downvoted because they go against what most people here believe. Doesn't quite seem like an army of professional "trolls" manipulating the discussion (If he is a troll, he would probably have presented his statements more effectively or subtly. The way he did almost guaranteed being downvoted).

Those "troll groups" are surely not a good thing, and you can never be certain this person wasn't one of them, but I also wouldn't label everyone I don't agree with a troll, just because they dare to write down their opinion, and my point of view is the one of the majority.

Post reply on HN