So the lesson learned here is that the police should not keep any records at all. The fact that this particular department ended up recording use could in some sense be considered an error. Law enforcement has been doing secret surveillance since before ever. The Stingray stuff is just an attempt to continue doing what they have always done in the face of encryption. It's probably time for society to have a discussio…
NY Cops Used ‘Stingray’ Spy Tool 46 Times Without Warrant
21–26 of 26 posts
Re: NY Cops Used ‘Stingray’ Spy Tool 46 Times Without Warrant
#22Isn't the whole idea to use it without having to get a warrant?
Re: NY Cops Used ‘Stingray’ Spy Tool 46 Times Without Warrant
#23Re: NY Cops Used ‘Stingray’ Spy Tool 46 Times Without Warrant
#24It seems to me a Stingray is designed specifically to get around the need for a court order. OTW they would just subpoena the records of a cell carrier to get the information on a target they suspect.
Re: NY Cops Used ‘Stingray’ Spy Tool 46 Times Without Warrant
#25So the lesson learned here is that the police should not keep any records at all. The fact that this particular department ended up recording use could in some sense be considered an error. Law enforcement has been doing secret surveillance since before ever. The Stingray stuff is just an attempt to continue doing what they have always done in the face of encryption. It's probably time for society to have a discussio…
The police broke the law. Whatever equivocations you want to offer in their defense, they broke the law.
Re: NY Cops Used ‘Stingray’ Spy Tool 46 Times Without Warrant
#26It seems to me a Stingray is designed specifically to get around the need for a court order. OTW they would just subpoena the records of a cell carrier to get the information on a target they suspect.
... but they still should be charged with hacking.