21–30 of 73 posts
> A:During the beta period logs are kept for 24 hours, once beta is complete there will be no call log records. Is there a particular reason to do so during their beta?
> A:During the beta period logs are kept for 24 hours, once beta is complete there will be no call log records. Is there a particular reason to do so during their beta?
That said, that's just a guess.
> A:During the beta period logs are kept for 24 hours, once beta is complete there will be no call log records. Is there a particular reason to do so during their beta?
> A:During the beta period logs are kept for 24 hours, once beta is complete there will be no call log records. Is there a particular reason to do so during their beta?
If there are logs to be kept to begin with, I'd be very skeptical about any "anonymous" and "secure" claims. If it requires trust, then it isn't.
ZRTP and the sign-up process means it will be hard to connect the little metadata they have, so they've narrowed down the amount they're trusted with by a large margin
Anonymity is quite the growing market segment. And the NSA is as unpopular as ever. It's fascinating how the public responds to the government.
Site seems dead. Is it free software? What differentiates it from Signal/TS?
http://hc3sz3i2rb5dljqq.onion/
Edit: my bad it's late...of course there is no risk of mitm as it's a tor service, so no risk of bad exit node -_-' sorry guys
Anonymity is quite the growing market segment. And the NSA is as unpopular as ever. It's fascinating how the public responds to the government.
Is that true? I hear bitcoin is gaining market share, and it is the antithesis of anonymity.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
If there are logs to be kept to begin with, I'd be very skeptical about any "anonymous" and "secure" claims. If it requires trust, then it isn't.
Every computer has logs. If you interact with a server, you can't avoid it. Until we have decentralized apps, trust on this is unavoidable. ZRTP and the sign-up process means it will be hard to connect the little metadata they have, so they've narrowed down the amount they're trusted with by a large margin
At best, it's pseudonymous.
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." I used to use this quote all the time too...until I realized it originally meant something entirely different. http://techcrunch.com/2014/02/14/how-the-world-butchered-ben...
I don't see how it means something entirely different. At most, Franklin and the other founding fathers had a more expansive notion of liberty than is now common. Both the sanctity of private property and the right to privacy are aspects of that sort of liberty.
"In short, Franklin was not describing some tension between government power and individual liberty. He was describing, rather, effective self-government in the service of security as the very liberty it would be contemptible to trade. Notwithstanding the way the quotation has come down to us, Franklin saw the liberty and security interests of Pennsylvanians as aligned."
http://www.lawfareblog.com/2011/07/what-ben-franklin-really-...
Hm. I'm not sure I get it. (from the Google cache) > Q: Can I call any number I want? > A: No. Ghost Call can only call other Ghost Call numbers. > Q: How can we contact you? > A: You can email us at info@ghostcall.io, or Ghost Call us: (490)-628-2381 So it's a ZRTP SIP provider that uses regular phone number format as the identifier? It strikes me as rather much like OSTN/OSTel, but using a phone-number-looking iden…