I think the intersection of politics and internet is interesting. I write about it quite a bit on my blog, as well as here: http://qbix.com/blog/index.php/2013/04/a-new-kind-of-platfor... In this case, we see sort of an "arab spring" of open source projects lately. Consider MySQL after it was bought by Oracle, and then the MariaDB fork was born. Now we have Node.js and Docker being forked. Until now, most successful…
Node.js, a popular tool for building modern internet services, has split in two
21–30 of 166 posts
Re: Node.js, a popular tool for building modern internet services, has split in two
#22Re: Node.js, a popular tool for building modern internet services, has split in two
#23Re: Node.js, a popular tool for building modern internet services, has split in two
#24I think the intersection of politics and internet is interesting. I write about it quite a bit on my blog, as well as here: http://qbix.com/blog/index.php/2013/04/a-new-kind-of-platfor... In this case, we see sort of an "arab spring" of open source projects lately. Consider MySQL after it was bought by Oracle, and then the MariaDB fork was born. Now we have Node.js and Docker being forked. Until now, most successful…
> Why not just fork Docker?
> From a security and composability perspective, the
> Docker process model - where everything runs through a
> central daemon - is fundamentally flawed. To “fix”
> Docker would essentially mean a rewrite of the project,
> while inheriting all the baggage of the existing
> implementation.Re: Node.js, a popular tool for building modern internet services, has split in two
#25Earlier quoted context omitted.
I can think of MySQL. While I wouldn't call it dead by any measure it certainly suffered when the spit happened.
Since i'm a newbie and I couldn't find anything with a simple search, could you elaborate on that particular MySQL situation?
Re: Node.js, a popular tool for building modern internet services, has split in two
#26Re: Node.js, a popular tool for building modern internet services, has split in two
#27Re: Node.js, a popular tool for building modern internet services, has split in two
#28Re: Node.js, a popular tool for building modern internet services, has split in two
#29> actually set up this foundation because they’re still hoping that Joyent will let them to use the Node.js trademark. Is that naivete on the side of Io.js here, or is there more to the story?
> the team hasn’t actually set up this foundation because they’re still hoping that Joyent will let them to use the Node.js trademark.
Frankly, I kinda like the name Io.js better than Node.js
Re: Node.js, a popular tool for building modern internet services, has split in two
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
But it's true that Node is losing traction.
I can only speak from the perspective of my company. We had quite a few pro-node people. They wrote services in node. All of those node services have since been rewritten in Go by the formerly-pro-node people. Go has been much more manageable and powerful.