Live data from Hacker News

Aurora - New MySQL-Compatible Database Engine

aws.amazon.com

21–30 of 138 posts

Re: Aurora - New MySQL-Compatible Database Engine

#21

Has anyone been able to find specific pricing on this? All of the language I've seen about it has been vague. One of the things that's kept me from using RDS for toy projects is that it basically amounts to running another instance on top of what I already have. For a "real" project, that's a drop in the bucket, but for toys and prototypes, it can be a significant chunk of the cost (so I usually end up just running m…

[deleted]

Re: Aurora - New MySQL-Compatible Database Engine

#22
post #20

Has anyone been able to find specific pricing on this? All of the language I've seen about it has been vague. One of the things that's kept me from using RDS for toy projects is that it basically amounts to running another instance on top of what I already have. For a "real" project, that's a drop in the bucket, but for toys and prototypes, it can be a significant chunk of the cost (so I usually end up just running m…

Pricing is at http://aws.amazon.com/rds/aurora/pricing/ The cheapest is a db.r3.large for $0.29 / hr

Ouch. Thanks.

Re: Aurora - New MySQL-Compatible Database Engine

#23
post #17

What is the use of a cloud relational database service? I thought everybody is going for Document Based databases.

If your data is fundamentally relational you're better off putting it into a relational DB. http://www.sarahmei.com/blog/2013/11/11/why-you-should-never...

Just want to point out that the headline is sensational and there are many good use cases for document stores.

Re: Aurora - New MySQL-Compatible Database Engine

#25
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Pricing is at http://aws.amazon.com/rds/aurora/pricing/ The cheapest is a db.r3.large for $0.29 / hr

Ouch. Thanks.

Reserved pricing knocks that down a significant amount if you decide to stick with this.

Re: Aurora - New MySQL-Compatible Database Engine

#28
I think the problem AWS is seeing is how they are being commoditized (e.g. you can just run your database on the cheapest hosting provider), so profits will move towards 0. They will need to add more services like this (Aurora, DynamoDB, etc.) to ensure AWS isn't a commodity (and you can't just easily switch to DigitalOcean).

Re: Aurora - New MySQL-Compatible Database Engine

#30
post #15

Why mysql? Why not postgres engine?

No one is saying that Aurora is built on MySQL, I'd personally like to know :) It's the protocol (drivers) compatibility what has been claimed so far.

I'd agree with you from a technical perspective it would have been better to offer Postgres compatibility, rather than MySQL. But I believe the intent is to target both a bigger market (as of today) and challenge Oracle.

Post reply on HN