Not that I'm here to defend Quora, but this level of heat makes me wonder whether the unnamed VC has some ongoing beef with it.
The downfall of Quora (2013)
21–30 of 123 posts
Re: The downfall of Quora (2013)
#22Re: The downfall of Quora (2013)
#23The business model seems, from the outside, to be the belief that, like Facebook and Twitter, they will make money somehow eventually after becoming a runaway success, even it takes years to monetize.
Re: The downfall of Quora (2013)
#24From the article kindly submitted here: "Quora's philosophy can be summed up as why should the serfs get a share if they were dumb enough to work for free in the first place?" That's a good question. What is the incentive to be a content creator on Quora? AFTER EDIT: Aside about the other comments wondering if Hacker News has a no-humor rule. I find comments from time to time on Hacker News that are laugh-out-loud fu…
Ironically, Quora is a great place to look for an answer to that question. [1] http://www.quora.com/Answers-Quora-feature/Why-do-people-ans...
Re: The downfall of Quora (2013)
#25Quora's auto linkification of text seems to be excellent. clueless.it indeed.
Re: The downfall of Quora (2013)
#26I'm acquainted with the founders of Quora, and I don't think making "fast money" was a primary motivation in founding Quora. They set out to create a question/answer site with a better user experience and a better community. The business model seems, from the outside, to be the belief that, like Facebook and Twitter, they will make money somehow eventually after becoming a runaway success, even it takes years to mone…
Their user interface choices always looked seriously weird to anyone familiar with almost any other website. It's beyond annoying to me to see a Quora link shared by friends (and actually quite rare for me to see a Quora link shared by anyone), because I never know if I will be able to read the Quora thread without logging in or not. Today, in this Hacker News thread, both the OP and the links submitted so far have been instantly visible to me, but that is not my usual experience with Quora. Rather, my usual experience, through several changes of Quora policy, has been to see nag screens asking me to sign up before I see any of Quora's content.
Re: The downfall of Quora (2013)
#27Earlier quoted context omitted.
ego. just like wikipedia it runs on the precious recource called 'mansplaining'. men really like to show off. just like this comment.
Is the sexism really necessary?
prove me wrong, with science.
it is the opposite of sexism - it is an uncomfortable truth.
Re: The downfall of Quora (2013)
#28Re: The downfall of Quora (2013)
#29"Quora's philosophy can be summed up as why should the serfs get a share if they were dumb enough to work for free in the first place?" Different currencies. The owners of Quora are being paid in US dollars, the content creators in both attention and reputation. Both attention and reputation are currencies that will translate to dollars more and more as we progress towards an, in-part, reputation-based economy. With…
"A reputation based economy is what we're moving towards", we should be resistant to that. I think it would be fair to say a "reputation based economy" is a synonym for crony capitalism -- I'll only do business with you if I know you. This is a socially unfair economy at best, and at worst will generate inequality as social cliques will continue to preserve and enrich themselves and "the people they know". If we're g…
Re: The downfall of Quora (2013)
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
In this case, looks up definition of mansplaining Yes. Yes it is. It is necessary to show his point. Not saying it is necessary in society. Cool your jets.
Sexism is never necessary. And what point would that be?
That little faggot with the earring and the make-up
Yeah, buddy, that's his own hair
That little faggot got his own jet airplane
That little faggot he's a millionaire
(b) The point is to attack the idea of "mansplaining". Yes, naming something is generally a prerequisite to insulting it.