Live data from Hacker News

S.&P. Says Argentina Has Defaulted

dealbook.nytimes.com

21–30 of 195 posts

Re: S.&P. Says Argentina Has Defaulted

#21
Argentina should never have handled the bonds under NY law and without control of the bondholder's list. That mistake is costing them dearly.

The only reason they can't pay everyone but the holdouts [e.g. selective default] is because of the fact they handled them under NY law after the 2001 default. :/

Re: S.&P. Says Argentina Has Defaulted

#22
post #19
post #3

To understand background and potential implication, I found http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2014/07/30/q-a-whats-behind-the-... helpful.

> Argentina issued bonds under New York law. Until I read this, I assumed that international bonds were issued under international law, with the World Bank as the arbitrator. With the US as both lender and arbitrator, it seems to give them a lot of power.

Yeah, that's very much not what the World Bank is about.

Re: S.&P. Says Argentina Has Defaulted

#23
post #16
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And here we thought you were going to say that the worst thing about living in Uruguay was the rampant nationalism between Uruguayans and Argentinians..

I don't see how this adds to the conversation. Also, Argentina and Uruguay have similar racial composition & as far as I can tell see themselves as the same people of the Rio Plata.

Not to bring too many facts into the discussion, but Uruguay and Argentina dont have similar racial composition:

http://www.indexmundi.com/uruguay/demographics_profile.html http://www.indexmundi.com/argentina/demographics_profile.htm...

Uruguay have 12% non-white, Argentina only 3%

That's not what I would call "similar".

Re: S.&P. Says Argentina Has Defaulted

#24
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Argentina issued bonds under New York law. Until I read this, I assumed that international bonds were issued under international law, with the World Bank as the arbitrator. With the US as both lender and arbitrator, it seems to give them a lot of power.

Yeah, that's very much not what the World Bank is about.

Well, I hadn't given it much thought. I just assumed that some international body (WTO, IMF, UN) would resolve disputes like this.

Re: S.&P. Says Argentina Has Defaulted

#26
post #12

Well, the recent Greek default seems to have been handled quite gracefully... (but of course, Greece is part of the EU zone, so there was a lot of help available) http://www.economist.com/node/21550271

This is the second default in 13 years, with (as you mention) no strong regional bank to support them, and (most likely) in a country without the political willpower to push through reforms to prevent this kind of thing happening again.

Re: S.&P. Says Argentina Has Defaulted

#27
Brazil and Argentina had very similar economic plans to get out of hyperinflation from the 80's - both created a new currency whose value was attached to the USD.

There was a subtle difference: Brazil forbade domestic contracts in dollar (with a few exceptions, mainly leasing contracts for imported vehicles). So when the market forces kicked in and Brazil was forced to devalue its artificially priced new currency, the impact was not that big.

In Argentina, most contracts were underwritten in dollars, so the government delayed devaluation as much as possible. As the result, when it finally adjusted the exchange rate to more realistic values, the guy who bought one home was bound to pay 3 or 4. The government solution was the first default (by passing a law saying you could pay these contracts with a huge discount). This is why they are in this mess, some creditors are fighting to receive the full value.

Re: S.&P. Says Argentina Has Defaulted

#28
post #9

Wow ! Just one investor can bring a country to its knees !

Wouldn't it be more fair to say endemic corruption and decades of misguided plans that swung too hard to socialist, then capitalist and then again socialist policies created this? The idea that the root cause of this is that a group of investors come along, buy debt on the open market and then expect that debt to be paid seems overly simplistic.

Defaulting is error on both sides, the borrower failed in risk analysis just like the debtor.

The problem is that sovereign nations don't have clear bankrupt procedure and these hedge funds are holding country as hostage for their past mistakes despite the fact that majority of borrowers accepted debt restructuring that was arranged and accepted haircuts.

If the debt and its interest grows past what country gdp can ever grow, they can never pay back and they either became debt slaves forever or keep defaulting. This is attempt at debt slavery in national level. (if person can't pay his debt ever, should he and his family lineage be responsible for that debt forever?)

I think it's reasonable to expect that in these cases banks should accept haircuts and settle like wast majority of investors did. Upholding business deal is ethically less important than country of millions being able to continue their life. The logical cost of country not being able to pay for their dept should be higher interest rates in future, not shutting country down.

Re: S.&P. Says Argentina Has Defaulted

#30
post #11

I don't mean to sound like an evangelist but i've been waiting for a currency to fail to see how/if crypto-currencies have the ability to get the country up and running again. In theory the tools are there if they can wrestle value out of their slumping traditional currency.

The peso has been all but failed for some years now, due to the falsification of inflation figures by the central bank, and the divergence between the real/market exchange rate and the "offical" exchange rate. The result has been fairly simple: people use USD.
Post reply on HN