Is "responsive" the new buzzword for "things that change when you resize them"? I've been seeing it used an awful lot in web design as of the past few years, often rather vaguely as some sort of feature.
[deleted]
Responsive Logos
21–30 of 58 posts
Re: Responsive Logos
#22Never seen "Coke" in that classic font before. Is it new or perhaps particular to the US?
Isn't it on all the cans? http://lmgtfy.com/?q=coke+cola+can
If you actually looked through the images page you will find that when the single word "Coke" is used (most notably on the Diet Coke can, but also on occasional promotional items) it's in a much more modern serifed font, rather than the script font used for the classic Coca Cola logo.
Re: Responsive Logos
#23If one makes the window narrow enough, the logos expand back to their maximal size.
Re: Responsive Logos
#24Simple's logo has been designed with "responsiveness" in mind: the more space they have, the more complex their logo is.
For example on https://www.simple.com/, the logo in the header is simpler that the logo on the credit card.
They also show the 3 versions they use in a blogpost: https://www.simple.com/blog/simple-branding
Re: Responsive Logos
#25Simple's logo has been designed with "responsiveness" in mind: the more space they have, the more complex their logo is. For example on https://www.simple.com/ , the logo in the header is simpler that the logo on the credit card. They also show the 3 versions they use in a blogpost: https://www.simple.com/blog/simple-branding
They seem to be using "The Hobo’s Method" as well.
Re: Responsive Logos
#26Is "responsive" the new buzzword for "things that change when you resize them"? I've been seeing it used an awful lot in web design as of the past few years, often rather vaguely as some sort of feature.
Sometimes when people use terms they know the meaning behind them ;)
This is the original article which named the technique: http://alistapart.com/article/responsive-web-design/
Although the technique was being used earlier than May 25, 2010.
Adaptive Web Design (responsive but on server side, not client) is the other technique popular with websites aiming to support 96% of browsers well. Because it's impossible to do that nicely for mobile browsers.
Mobile first, offline first are the other two related terms you've likely heard. Meaning design for mobile first, or offline first.
Re: Responsive Logos
#27Not responsive on ipad
Re: Responsive Logos
#28If one makes the window narrow enough, the logos expand back to their maximal size.
Was about to say the same thing. I guess for around less than 100px.
Re: Responsive Logos
#29NIKE loses the "I" when made smaller
Re: Responsive Logos
#30Is "responsive" the new buzzword for "things that change when you resize them"? I've been seeing it used an awful lot in web design as of the past few years, often rather vaguely as some sort of feature.
Ish. It is the buzzword for "the same design works on a vast range of screen sizes and orientations". The fact that things rearrange dynamically as you resize your window on a desktop box is not the main target, the target is a design working equally well on your desktop, your table in both landscape and portrait, your much smaller phone, and so forth, so the designer doesn't need to maintain multiple versions of the…
In this particular case, could anyone explain how high pixel density and responsiveness would work together at the same time?